Search for: "State v Bell" Results 1881 - 1900 of 3,337
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2012, 12:18 pm by Jeffrey May
According to the appellate court, the lower court misapplied the plausibility standards set by Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:52 pm by Rick
I’m talking about the latest case from the United States Supreme Court — Florence v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:19 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In 2009, Dabney Carr wrote:Exergen echoes the Supreme Court’s decisions in Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:30 am
That decision was given in response to the Pliva v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:24 am by INFORRM
The assessment of damages is subject to the “ceiling” on damages in defamation cases – which the the Judge suggests is now £256,000 ([26]) – although he noted that it was recently stated to be £230-240,000 in Al-Amoudi v Kifle [2011] EWHC 2037 (QB). [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:56 am by Erik Lundegaard
It was designed to develop policies that were more progressive for state legislators and local government in the state. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“And, although the idea of post-market review of deceptive claims may be appealing to the tobacco industry, the government has made a reasonable determination that, in the context of a deadly and highly addictive product, it would be a virtual impossibility to unring the bell of misinformation after it has been rung. [read post]