Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 1881 - 1900 of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm by A. Brian Albritton
Dear Readers:Just recently, the Eleventh Circuit largely overturned the District Court’s decision in US and State of Florida ex re Ruckh v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 10:18 am by admin@lawiscoool.com (Omar Ha-Redeye)
The anticipated ruling by the SCC in Prime Minister of Canada v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 7:59 pm
It also notes that by making the punishment for child rape and murder equivalent, a state that punishes child rape by death may remove a strong incentive for the rapist not to kill the victim. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:57 pm by Eric D. Morton, Attorney
  The key to the case:  The employer had strong computer use and confidentiality policies. [read post]
24 May 2017, 5:36 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals disagrees, killing off the habeas petition.The case is Waiters v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 6:24 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This ruling vacates a State Supreme Court ruling that held that New York's recent law that intended to outlaw mandatory arbitration in such cases is not preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.The case is Newton v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
 This is what she writes:Defamation v Freedom of Expression: The ECHR Grand Chamber Hands Down Judgment in Delfi v EstoniaOn 16 July 2015, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) handed down its much-awaited judgment in Delfi AS v Estonia. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 6:51 pm
Liebowitz maintained his position, but did say that under a system where people have strong enough will to break the laws relating to strong property rights that there may not be an enforceable system which gives people the strong property rights they once enjoyed.He was asked if it was his position that if there was a weakening of property rights that it led to a decline in production in general. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:22 pm
Today, DRI filed an amicus curiae brief in the United States Supreme Court in CompuCredit Corporation and Synovus Bank v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:07 am by ELEANOR MITCHELL
According to Lady Hale, failing to exempt A from the “bedroom tax” was discriminatory “in the sense described in Thlimmenos v Greece: treating her like any other single parent with one child when in fact she ought to be treated differently” (at [75]). [read post]