Search for: "United States v. North Carolina" Results 1881 - 1900 of 2,782
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:06 am by Amy Howe
North Carolina, in which the Court held that requiring a sex offender to wear a GPS monitor for the rest of his life constitutes a search and sent the case back to the state courts. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:31 am by Ronald Mann
” The issue in Office of the United States Trustee v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:11 am
(in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 08-479 Title: Safford United School District #1 v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:04 am by Tammy Binford
That’s because those agencies issued guidance after the Supreme Court’s 2013 United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 1:31 pm by Amy Howe
The state appealed to the Supreme Court, which announced in January that it would review the case, Lamone v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
North Carolina, in which the Supreme Court struck down a state law banning access by registered sex offenders to some social-media sites, observing that the decision “injected some uncommon good sense into the  debate driven generally by irrational panic and flawed statistics over how the criminal justice system should deal with sex offenders. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 4:42 am by Michelle Claverol
In one North Carolina case, the condominium unit owners’ policy in question (from Lloyd’s) specifically covered loss of rents, which were “new rental proceeds that would be payable to [the named insured] had the premises been occupied in accordance with ‘rental contract’. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
For cases so stating as to judicial elections, see North Carolina State Bar v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 12:11 pm
Simmons 2005).The report, a joint project of NAMI and Murder Victims' Families for Human Rights (MVFHR), is based on extensive interviews with 21 family members from 10 states: California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Tennessee and Texas. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm by Tom Goldstein
Abbott Docket: 08-645 Argument date: January 12, 2010 Question presented: Under a treaty signed by the United States, a child taken from his home country in violation of a "right of custody" generally must be returned to that country. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm by Charles G. Kels
In North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:39 am by Bill Raftery
However, that effort was struck down by Federal courts only a day or two after the election (Awad v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:10 am
At one dialysis center in North Carolina, 2 in 3 patients at dialysis centers in North Carolina told researchers that their doctors had not mentioned the treatment’s risks or burdens. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:26 am by Greg Mersol
  The court found that the matter of whether the work was professional or not turned on state law, and as the work was performed in North Carolina, that state’s law controlled. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:08 am by Gerard Magliocca
 In a few Southern States (most notably North Carolina) this interracial alliance managed to wrest control of the state legislature and elect members of Congress. [read post]