Search for: "United States v. State of Michigan" Results 1881 - 1900 of 3,229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Bollinger, he said this about black students at the University of Michigan Law School: “The Law School tantalizes unprepared students with the promise of a University of Michigan degree and all of the opportunities that it offers. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:56 pm by My name
Earlier this month a United Kingdom court took their turn on stage in the world-wide Apple v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 4:49 am by SHG
Warren attended the Iliff School of Theology, an independent graduate school related to the United Methodist Church, before deciding to study law at the University of Michigan, where he graduated with honors. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:36 pm by WIMS
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
Louisiana: Overturned 1986 ruling in Michigan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court held that the federal bank robbery statute’s “forced accompaniment” provision applies whenever a bank robber forces someone to go somewhere with him, even for a short distance. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
United States, 12-223, and Pleau v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:13 pm by Rick Hasen
, Election Law Journal (forthcoming 2011) (draft available) Citizens United and the Orphaned Antidistortion Rationale, 27 Georgia State Law Review 989 (2011) (symposium on Citizens United) The Nine Lives of Buckley v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 12:13 pm by Julie Lam
  To “sit” has been interpreted by the Michigan Supreme Court to generally mean “to hold court” or “do any act of a judicial nature. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 1:29 pm by Amy Howe
The United States also filed an amicus brief supporting the challengers. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 1:58 pm by Amy Howe
The challengers, the parents of children in private religious schools in Michigan, argued that the state constitutional provision violates the U.S. [read post]