Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 61,615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2016, 2:35 pm
In Ghiselli v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:55 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:32 am
Considers whether the conditions of entitlement to State Pension Credit were compatible with Regulation 1408/71, which prohibits discrimination between nationals of different Member States. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 12:17 pm
 The decision is here and the case is entitled Lee v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
Shea blogged here about State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:33 pm
FEC, Burwell v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 8:24 am
In short, stating that employees must be compensated for overtime work is not enough. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 9:38 pm
This is what happened in a recent case of Gordon v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 3:47 am
TUPE The new consultation proposes to: Clarify the scope of TUPE to limit the provisions of TUPE to “employees” and to specifically state that workers do not fall within scope. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:00 pm
Order Denying Stockman’s Request for Production of Audit Committee Report and Investigative Work Plan, US v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 7:44 am
” Agri Processor Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:33 am
The case is entitled Cormier et al. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 3:53 pm
While some of the Circuit judges wanted to base the decision on Toten the majority instead based the decision on United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
As the court stated in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 7:34 am
In August 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an opinion clarifying the legal standard used to analyze retaliatory hostile work environment claims. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:58 pm
This Article offers a comprehensive examination of the Skidmore standard for judicial review of agency legal interpretations as applied by the courts in the period since the Supreme Court revitalized Skidmore in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:41 am
NEUSTADT ) v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:38 am
Citing Littleton v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
Introduction The Supreme Court heard argument last month in Moore v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:25 am
Only two things worked out well for Qualcomm on the litigation front this year: the Lasinski cross-examination and the fact that the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit allowed Qualcomm's interlocutory appeal of Judge Lucy H. [read post]
