Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 1901 - 1920 of 48,916
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
Matter of Gooshaw v City of Ogdensburg, 2009 NY Slip Op 08738, ___A.D.3d ___ (3d Dept. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 4:04 am by Jeremy Telman
Supreme Court heard arguments in two consolidated landmark affirmative action cases, styled Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm by GWS Law
Wickes Building Supplies Ltd v Blair (No.2: Costs) [2020] EWCA Civ 17; [2020] 1 WLR 1246 at [21, 28-29]) CA endorsed Parker v Butler Howe v Motor Insurers’ Bureau (No. 2) [2017] EWCA Civ 932; [2018] 1 W.L.R. 923. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 9:55 am by Alexandra Allan
This case exemplifies the fact that courts will impose costs sanctions and award damages if a party acts contrary to an exclusive English law and jurisdiction clause. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 8:15 am by Shaunna Mireau
The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed (with costs) the appeal in Morrow v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:09 am by Daniel Shaviro
 In a class that is coming up soon, we will be discussing the U.S. transfer pricing rules.From a purely pedagogical perspective, when I read the recent case of Altera Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 6:37 pm by John O'Sullivan
Brown released today in York University v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 4:34 pm
 The retailer is paying the tax, so adds it to the cost of the product. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
" Thus, in addition to the SEC computing the costs associated with an access contest, it was supposed to assess the costs when an access contest does not occur. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 8:09 pm by Berin Szoka
Here are his four categories of costs: Thanks for all the crapware, Judge Competition among browsers? [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:48 am
According to this Advertiser piece, the chief justice and the governor are not seeing eye to eye on cost cutting. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:02 pm by David Jacobson
In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Healey (No 2) [2011] FCA 1003 Federal Court Judge Middleton decided the penalties arising from his decision in ASIC v Healey as follows: The CEO Scott has been ordered to pay to the Commonwealth a penalty in the amount of $30,000 plus a share of costs; the CFO Romano George Nenna is disqualified from managing corporations for a period of two years from 4.30pm on 10 October 2011; the applications for relief for… [read post]