Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 1901 - 1920 of 16,690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2022, 4:21 am by Peter Mahler
The respondents’ cross-appeal challenged the trial court’s application of the asset-based approach over the income-based approach. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  He was teaching English at Howard University when the United States entered the First World War in 1917. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 12:01 am by Florian Mueller
-internal antisuit injunction (an instrument of which some United States Senators are, or pretend to be, blissfully ignorant) that would bar Philips from enforcing a U.S. import ban. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 9:59 am by Charlotte Garden
But Southwest argued that the court should read that language much more narrowly, to exempt only workers in job categories that involve crossing state or national borders. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Florian Mueller
A 2019 Ericsson press release anounced an initial cross-license agreement.The way courts in at least Germany and the UK apply Huawei v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 6:02 pm
 中华人民共和国个人信息保护法Personal Information Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China  (2021年8月20日第十三届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第三十次会议通过)(Passed at the 30th meeting of the Standing… [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Benjamin Wittes
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am by Alyson Poole (AU)
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am by Alyson Poole (AU)
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]