Search for: "Day v. Texas" Results 1901 - 1920 of 7,691
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2020, 1:00 am by Alan
He is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, year-round and your initial consultation is free. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: Emma Platoff reports at The Texas Tribune (via How Appealing) that “Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton asked the U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 7:53 am by John Floyd
  In 2013, a New York federal district court in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:22 am by Robert Chesney
If everyone on board was healthy at the forty-day mark, then and only then could they come ashore. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 8:32 am by Kalvis Golde
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog, Aaron Tang suggests that there is an issue lurking in Espinoza v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:47 am by Kalvis Golde
At Law360 (registration required), Daniel Dalton argues that, should the justices decide Espinoza v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:15 am by Ilya Somin
March 18, 3:40-4:30 PM, America's Health Insurance Plans, National Health Policy Conference: Panel on "Texas v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 6:00 am by Jesse M. Coleman and Brian Wadsworth
On January 23, 2020, the Texas Fifth District Court of Appeals in Dallas retracted its previous ruling in the trade secrets dispute Goldberg, et al. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 11:56 am by Leah Litman and Steve Vladeck
Dalton Cross Professor in Law at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:52 pm by Sandy Levinson
 It would mean, though, that Congress could rid us of unfit chief executives who can do (and in fact do inflict) much mischief, as Tyler did, including the unconstitutional annexation of Texas by ordinary statute instead of the treaty that would never get through the  Senate. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 10:00 am by Jennifer Dalven
If that rings a bell, it’s because not even four years ago the Supreme Court struck down an identical Texas law in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter remarks on the court’s refusal last week to expedite consideration of “the Affordable Care Act challenge in Texas v. [read post]