Search for: "Does 1-71"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 2,540
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2011, 12:06 am
In the draft guidance, FDA asserts that a substance does not necessarily qualify as a dietary ingredient merely because it occurs in food. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:43 pm
NBC news is reporting that the cab driver is 71 years old and does not have a great driving record. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
Paragraph 46 of Circular 1/06 states that in such circumstances local planning authorities are expected to give substantial weight to the unmet need in considering whether temporary planning permission is justified. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
Paragraph 46 of Circular 1/06 states that in such circumstances local planning authorities are expected to give substantial weight to the unmet need in considering whether temporary planning permission is justified. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:30 am
(See Seanad Eireann Debates, Criminal Procedure Bill 2009: Committee Stage (Resumed), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 vol. 199 no.1 col 52-53.) [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Ohio, 273 U.S. 510, 47 S.Ct. 437, 71 L.Ed. 749 (1927). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:32 am
I get 71 Google hits, which I guess is not quite zero in Google numbers, but it is pretty close to vanishingly small. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
This means that the exact logic applied by the Board to the case above would not operate because R 137 as applicable today does not refer to a first communication any more.Does this mean that the situation is completely different today? [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:02 am
2011 WL 2117257, at *1. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:33 am
That being said, parties are reminded that the Board does not need all existing relevant information to set fair tariffs. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:06 am
” Id. at 1570-71. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:06 pm
Livingston, 5 N.J. 65, 71 (1950). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
As intended there Zometa is a type of drug learned intermediary doctrine encourages a doctor-patient dialogue.Zometa does not fall within the exception of the restatement and I, therefore, find a direct warning to Mr. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:56 am
(Rev.71, Issued: 05-13-11, Effective: 5-13-11-Implementation: 05-13-11) §416.42(A) STANDARD: ANESTHETIC RISK AND EVALUATION (1) A physician must examine the patient immediately before surgery to evaluate the risk of anesthesia and of the procedure to be performed. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:56 am
(Rev.71, Issued: 05-13-11, Effective: 5-13-11-Implementation: 05-13-11) §416.42(A) STANDARD: ANESTHETIC RISK AND EVALUATION (1) A physician must examine the patient immediately before surgery to evaluate the risk of anesthesia and of the procedure to be performed. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:53 am
Conta, 71 Wis.2d 662, 239 N.W.2d 313 (1976) – recognizes that very distinction. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:02 pm
Those issues, and the Court’s findings on each issue, are outlined below. 1. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm
The following statements are prohibited: 1. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
This standard does not trigger the duty to preserve documents from the mere existence of a potential claim or the distant possibility of litigation. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:00 pm
Using a per acre production cost of $850, (how does that compare with yours?) [read post]
