Search for: "English v. State" Results 1901 - 1920 of 6,403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2012, 9:15 am by Howard Friedman
Unnamed Wallens Ridge State Prison Employees, 2012 U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am by Alessandro Cerri
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:44 am by Léon Dijkman
An English version of the decision, couresy of Arnold Ruess, can be found here . [read post]
Kookmin bank duly provided the refund guarantees in the form of advanced payment bonds, governed by English law. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the Article 10 case of Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
  He held that on the basis of binding English authority, the English legislative regime which permits the recovery of the additional liabilities is not incompatible with Article 10 of the Convention and that, in any event, MGN was not entitled to rely on any incompatibility. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:11 am by INFORRM
On 27 October 2015 Mr Justice Blue, sitting at first instance in the Supreme Court of South Australia, handed down judgment on liability in the defamation case of Duffy v Google Inc ([2015] SASC 170). [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Last month, the United States Supreme Court held in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:45 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In the previous post on this topic, we had discussed a portion of the landmark case of Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 7:03 am by Poppy Rimington-Pounder
 The Supreme Court held that the Appeal Court had not applied the correct test from R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, which for threats from third parties is whether the state has failed to provide reasonable protection against harm inflicted by non-state agents. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 9:36 pm by Kim Nayyer
In Opinion analysis: Justices reject publisher’s claims in gray-market copyright case, SCOTUSblog (Mar. 19, 2013, 12:22 PM), Ronald Mann of SCOTUSblog nicely summarizes the ruling, in Plain English: In Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 19 June 2015, Ms Romanova broke her silence by sending a letter to the Court stating that the she could not engage with the proceedings for various reasons, including a limited ability to speak, read and write in English (meaning she had to rely on Mr Kozlov for translations), an impecunious financial position and an inability to obtain pro-bono representation or conduct the litigation in person. [read post]