Search for: "Germany v. Germany" Results 1901 - 1920 of 4,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2017, 5:15 pm
-based patent assertion entity, sued Google, Samsung and Huawei for infringement under six UK patents (corresponding actions were filed in Germany). [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm by Dwight Sullivan
 He wanted to leave the Army for civilian practice to be with his wife, but the Army wouldn’t release him, so he went to Germany. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
  As I blogged about recently, a federal court in New York took a different view regarding a trademark issue involving eBay than the courts in France and Germany had taken on the issue. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
” At the ABA Journal, Erwin Chemerinsky writes that upcoming abortion case June Medical Services v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 2:30 am by INFORRM
This is an interesting new dimension to the debate – one which could be further informed by the forthcoming Strasbourg Grand Chamber case of Von Hannover v Germany (No.2) (see our discussion here). [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 11:34 am
Cases reported this time round include* The ETERNA trade mark dispute from Germany, on whether shirts bearing that trade mark and handed over to a forwarding agent in the European Union, in the false expectation that they would be exported outside the European Economic Area, have been first marketed in the European Union by the trade mark owner or with its consent;* The recent European Court of Human Rights decision that trade mark applications are protectable possessions, in Anheuser-Busch… [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:03 am
Roaring out of the Pits this morning, the General Court (the artist formerly known as the Court of First Instance) handed down its judgment in Case T-10/09 Formula One Licensing BV v OHIM (available from the curia website here).The facts are straightforward: the following mark was applied for in respect of goods and services “relating to the field of formula 1” in Nice Classes 16, 38 and 41 (including Magazines, Books and Pamphlets and their communication and dissemination… [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:56 am by Florian Mueller
But the target date for the actual decision is always four months after the decision (in this case, that's already January), and even if the final decision was an import ban, there would be a 60-day Presidential Review period before it takes effect.In Germany, there are four Samsung v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Regular readers of this blog know my view that the  rise of collective investor actions outside the United States is one of the most important developments in the world of directors’ and officers’ liability in recent years. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
– Brian Cathcart Case Law, Strasbourg: ML and WW v Germany, Article 8 right to be forgotten and the media – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Aidan Wills Case Law: Venables v News Group Papers, Application to Vary Confidentiality Injunction Dismissed, PJS extended – Samuel Rowe Case Law: Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court abolished common law presumption of damage in libel cases – Mathilde Groppo Supreme Court considers social media defamation:… [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 5:02 am by INFORRM
 Follow us @inforrm Our Top Twenty Posts of all time have been as follows (in descending order of popularity): Case Law: PJS v News Group Newspapers, Court of Appeal grants privacy injunction – Sara Mansoori and Aidan Wills Harassment and injunctions: Cheryl Cole – Natalie Peck The cases of Vanessa Perroncel and John Terry – a curious legal affair – Dominic Crossley How to avoid defamation – Steven Price Case Law, Strasbourg: Von Hannover v… [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 12:21 pm
The AmeriKat recommends that readers review the letters of opposition filed last week, including those from France and Germany. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm by Schachtman
See “Bad Gatekeeping or Missed Opportunity – Allen v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:36 am by INFORRM
For example, there was much simplistic reference to the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in von Hannover v Germany 59320/00, (2005) 40 EHRR 1, [2004] ECHR 294 (24 June 2004)), without reference to the significantly narrower sequel in von Hannover v Germany (No 2) 40660/08 and 60641/08 [2012] ECHR 228 (7 February 2012) and Axel Springer AG v Germany 39954/08 [2012] ECHR 227 (7 February 2012). [read post]