Search for: "Herring v. State" Results 1901 - 1920 of 58,147
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2010, 7:50 am
This term, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case of Gould v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 7:58 am
Thank goodness Clarence Gideon did not have to appear opposite you in 1963 and instead, he wrote a five page petition for writ of cert to the highest court in our land, the United States Supreme Court, which ultimately handed down the decision of Gideon v. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 8:56 am by Eric Goldman
She asserted that Google was a state actor and bound by First Amendment limits on restriction of her speech. [read post]
28 May 2016, 5:45 am by The Swartz Law Firm
In United States v Holmes the defendant appealed his conviction for production of child pornography and possession of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2251(a) and 2252(a) (4)(B). [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 6:38 am by Unreported Opinions
Civil litigation — Failure to request leave to amend complaint — Failure to state claim Allegra Hemphill, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Vivian Hemphill, appellants, appeals from the dismissal, with prejudice, of her complaint against Battles Transportation, Inc. by the Circuit Court for Montgomery County. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 12:31 pm by admin
Can an ex-wife enforce an affidavit of support against her debtor ex-husband in bankruptcy court after the state divorce court has already terminated spousal support? [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 11:45 am by Eric Goldman
Further, the image associated with Defendant’s Twitter account is a photo of her on the state house floor. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:49 pm by Richard D. Friedman
(That doesn’t mean there are none; if the state knows where a witness is and ihttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gift can invoke a formal procedure to secure her presence, then it should do so; this is Barber v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:57 am
"This means, said the court, that a person may be disabled within the meanings of New York's state and municipal laws even if his or her impairment does not substantially limit a major life activity.As a procedural matter, the Circuit Court noted that the statute governing supplemental jurisdiction, [28 USC 1367] did not require dismissal of pendent state-law claims such as Giordano's where all of the federal claims have been dismissed. [read post]