Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 8,735
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2020, 11:37 am
If you strain your memory very hard, you might recall a man named Robert Mueller. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:31 am
Breyer emphasized Thuraissigiam’s “status” as akin to one stopped at the border and opined that “[t]o interpret the Suspension Clause as insisting upon habeas review of these claims would require, by constitutional command, that the habeas court make indeterminate and highly record-intensive judgments on matters of degree. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am
Rather than focusing on Thuraissigiam’s goal of gaining another chance at asylum, Sotomayor framed Thuraissigiam’s claims as challenges to the asylum officer’s application of the law to the facts, noting that “[a]t bottom, respondent alleged that he was unlawfully denied admission under governing asylum statutes and regulations. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
The Court observed that “[t]he Legislature has recognized that both enrollment levels and physical development are related features of campus growth that must be mitigated under CEQA. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 11:13 am
Elias added that “[w]hile these were nominally antitrust investigations, and used antitrust investigative authorities, they were not bona fide antitrust investigations. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 10:14 am
James W. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 7:58 am
” “‘[W]e conclude that the motion to disqualify did not, as a matter of law, allege sufficient facts supporting a reasonable inference of actual or apparent bias or prejudice to require disqualification,’ wrote former Justice Alex J. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:35 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet… [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 10:12 am
Held: “[W]e see no basis for limiting our review under the fourth prong to the record adduced at trial. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 5:00 pm
It's a matter of interpretation. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 10:43 am
Charge stacking is commonplace in federal criminal matters. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
If our intuitions aren’t trustworthy, then neither are the theories we base on them. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Follow @PoliceLawProf Seth W. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 5:43 am
Ct. 524, 528-29 (2019), and Rent-A-Center W., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Lives matter more than things. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:01 pm
[But t]he Code of Conduct makes clear that federal judges, with the authority granted by their appointments, have special responsibilities in their public extrajudicial writings and speaking. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 2:28 pm
Book, by Judge Mark W. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 8:34 am
In the court’s view, “[w]here the suspect poses no immediate threat to the officer and no threat to others, the harm resulting from failing to apprehend him does not justify the use of deadly force to do so. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
” “[A]s a general matter, the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 1:42 am
Lehtimaki & Ors v Cooper, heard 14- 15 January 2020 R V C, heard 27 January 2020 Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd (Northern Ireland), heard 28- 29 January 2020 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd, heard 11-12 February 2020 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation… [read post]
