Search for: "In re: AMERICAN PRINCIPLES IN ACTION" Results 1901 - 1920 of 2,915
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2013, 3:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
   Also thinks that 9th Circuit has gone off the rails on the whole underlying principles of vicarious liability. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:43 am by David Urban
Senators and the Speaker of the House filed “friends of the court” briefs authored by prominent national appellate lawyers, arguing that the President had overstepped his powers in an effort to re-shape American labor law. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 8:37 am by Steve Honig
  Philosophers and the American Civil Liberties Union focus on these issues. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:53 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
”  The Rules of Conduct incorporated into the arbitration clause stated that the arbitration would be conducted under the procedures of JAMS (an American-based dispute resolution service) or the American Arbitration Association. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 12:46 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
  As the President said in the State of the Union, we will take action to protect our economy against cyber-threats. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 8:48 am by Schachtman
  The heretics have maintained a rearguard action against Daubert, and Rule 702; they have tried to undermine gatekeeping at every turn. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 3:00 am by Karel Frielink
The latter means that the American decision must also be considered conclusive (res judicata). [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:36 pm by Michelle Yeary
”  For over forty years Nyquil has been a staple in American homes for when your head feels like it weighs 50 pounds, you’re shivering with fever and you’re going through a box of tissues an hour. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:31 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  As a policy matter, the result required by Andrews could undermine the principles that animated American Pipe or, at least, strip plaintiffs of their ability to pursue an otherwise viable subclass action without filing a protective lawsuit. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
In describing the core "rule of inclusion" that "accounts for the vast bulk of suits that arise under" (federal law creates the cause of action), the Court cites American Well Works (the original opinion by Justice Holmes) rather than the Court’s more recent statement in last term’s Mims v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If there is a structure that makes sense and someone can come in and say “these are the principles/policy at issue and this is how to fill the gap,” we’re happy to consider that. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 8:58 am
The Committee agrees with the American Bar Association that prohibiting a lawyer from using such information essentially is no different than prohibiting a lawyer from representing certain clients in the future, and thus such a settlement provision is an impermissible restriction on the practice of law in violation of Rule 5.6(b). [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 10:11 pm by Jon Gelman
Putting New Jersey first is the principle that has guided my every action—from building up our transportation network to making our environment healthier and our communities safer and more secure. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:17 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
At the same time, we’re taking a proactive approach to budgeting and stewardship so that we are more resilient. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:34 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Group II.4: Law, Pathology and Politics Chair: Professor Wayne Morrison, Department of Law, Queen Mary, University of London Speaker 1: Herlinde Pauer-Studer, The Role of Morality in Nazi Conceptions of Law Speaker 2: Nicholas Gervassis, History of a Patient: Drafting and the Subconscious of Law in Action Speaker 3: Arudra Burra, Political Neutrality and the Continuity of Law Group II.5: The Relevance of History for Legal Theory Chair:… [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 4:41 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Because palimony actions are based upon principles of contract, plaintiff's cause of action accrued at the time defendant is alleged to have breached the agreement, not at the time the promise of lifetime support was purportedly made. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
Immigrants living here illegally must be held responsible for their actions by passing national security and criminal background checks, paying taxes and a penalty, going to the back of the line, and learning English before they can earn their citizenship. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:53 pm by Ruby Powers
Immigrants living here illegally must be held responsible for their actions by passing national security and criminal background checks, paying taxes and a penalty, going to the back of the line, and learning English before they can earn their citizenship. [read post]