Search for: "In re April B." Results 1901 - 1920 of 3,287
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm by Bill Marler
Interestingly, she links to a 1997 memo that recommended FDA re-examine its 60-day aging process for hard cheeses made from raw milk. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 10:03 am by Eric
On April 17, 2013, the Supreme Court granted discretionary review in Crabtree's case. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 3:26 am by Robert Kraft
“Things are changing very quickly, and we’re struggling a little bit to keep up with the pace of change as we update our performance standards,” she said. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
On 11 April 2000, the will was admitted to probate and on the same date, a letters testamentary was issued to B, her son. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:38 am by Florian Mueller
On March 6, 2013, Plaintiff-Appellee filed with the Regional Court a motion to order contempt fines against Defendant-Appellant in accordance with § 888 ZPO in order to enforce the accounting owed under the Regional Court's ruling.In an order dated April 22, 2013, this Court, with the consent of the parties [which -- and the order doesn't mention this but I will -- Google's counsel originally withheld], stayed the appellate proceedings pending adjudication by the Federal… [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 4:08 am by J
There is a very good article by District Judge Parmiter (Law Society Gazette, April 29, 1992, pg.17) to the extent that these charges should be left out of account. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 4:08 am by J
There is a very good article by District Judge Parmiter (Law Society Gazette, April 29, 1992, pg.17) to the extent that these charges should be left out of account. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Likewise, in In re Propulsid Products Liability Litigation, 2003 WL 367739 (E.D. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:36 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(D.I. 24 at 12) Indeed, the summary of Gevo's interview with the examiner on April 22, 2011, notes that Gevo "indicated that [it] would look into the possibility of broadening the scope of the genus of KIVDs. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:29 am by Stephen Bilkis
On 22 January 2004, B has now served another motion characterized as a motion to dismiss but again seeking to re-litigate the jurisdictional issues previously decided by this Court. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  This guidance categorizes six different types of changes, with the category we’re discussing – labeling – on pages 24-26. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
According to this decision, point [1] of the Reasons:“… the amended version of R 36 which entered into force on 1 April 2010 is still based on the principle that a divisional application may be filed ‘relating to any pending earlier European patent application’. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 5:14 am by Susan Brenner
COUNSEL: Why did you re-examine it? [read post]