Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 1901 - 1920
of 13,491
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2015, 4:26 am
In re P.A., 211 Cal. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 2:33 am
They were originally cast by Warner & Sons of Cripplegate, London in 1865–7; they were introduced into St James from Pendlebury where, in 1936, they had been re-tuned and re-hung on metal stocks by John Taylor & Co of Loughborough; this firm will be undertaking the work of removing the bells and re-installing them at Over Kellet [9]. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 1:59 am
Meanwhile, Claim 16 pertains to an essentially biological method for the production of plants, i.e., crossing and selection. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 12:20 am
., 139 F.3d 1368, 1372 n. 4 (11th Cir.1998); In re Shell Oil Co., 932 F.2d 1518, 1523 (5 th Cir.1991); Farm Constr. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 11:05 am
Comments and reply comments are due 30 days and 60 days (respectively) after publication of the NPRM in the Federal Register, at which time we’re sure to see whether most interested parties consider this a proposal to “sweeten the incentives” (per Chairwoman Rosenworcel) or just a “collateral attack” on the earlier elimination of the main studio rule (per Commissioner Simington). [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
If you’re a contractor performing on a military installation, keep this case tucked in the back of your mind. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 12:17 am
., 139 F.3d 1368, 1372 n. 4 (11th Cir.1998); In re Shell Oil Co., 932 F.2d 1518, 1523 (5 th Cir.1991); Farm Constr. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:31 pm
Chester Talton, resigned (i.e., retired), to be its new provisional bishop to replace the outgoing Jerry A. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:32 am
See e.g., In re Oracle Sec. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:32 am
See e.g., In re Oracle Sec. [read post]
19 May 2021, 1:34 pm
Seyfarth Synopsis: Proposed California legislation, SB 62, would hold certain garment retailers known as “brand guarantors” (i.e. those that license their brand or name for manufacturing) responsible for labor violations occurring down the supply chain. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 4:49 am
Or can the government legitimately say: "Look, we're willing to discuss a plea deal, but if you don't have a lawyer and can't afford one, tough; you're either going to have to do it yourself or get criminally charged. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm
Sure enough, the former lower limit - i.e. 0.33 - was not disclosed in the priority document, but the new lower limit - i.e. ] 0.33 - is not, either.Second, by allowing this disclaimer, the Board accepts a disclaimer that not only re-establishes novelty over an A 54(3) document, which is acceptable under G 1/03, but also (in the eyes of the Board) re-establishes priority, which is not something that G 1/03 had allowed.All in all, a very questionable decision.If… [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 6:04 am
Excessive internal links (i.e. footer links, etc). [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 6:04 am
Excessive internal links (i.e. footer links, etc). [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 9:39 am
See In re: The Deli Den, LLC, 425 B.R. 725 (Bankr. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 1:43 pm
This is a red flag for employees and Department of Labor alike, because the employees questioned (as anyone would) if their duties were identical pre and post re-classification, why were they not getting overtime pay prior to the re-classification. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 3:21 pm
And while we’re here – what about my approach to comment moderation – too soft? [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Other mechanisms such as re-issue (Section 47 of the Patent Act), disclaimer (Section 48) or re-examination (Section 48.1) may also be considered for issued patents, but each raises new issues and may not be available or desirable in a specific circumstance. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
And You’re Done! [read post]
