Search for: "John Does 6-8" Results 1901 - 1920 of 2,815
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2012, 12:34 am by Tessa Shepperson
As Tom points out, only 8% of PRS landlords win deposit disputes outright and the reason is not down to unfair adjudicators, just sloppily drafted claims. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:53 am by William McGrath
The Stanford Ponzi Case On March 6, 2012, Robert Allen Stanford was convicted for his decades-long Ponzi scheme that bilked investors of over $7 billion. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 2:05 am by Ken Shigley
Judicial independence faces many challenges, but perhaps the greatest threat is the erosion of judicial pay to the extent that Chief Justice John Roberts has said approaches a “constitutional crisis. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
Clarke (NY-11), Steve Cohen (TN-9), Dianne DeGette (CO-1), Bob Filner (CA-5), Barney Frank (MA-4), Luis Gutierrez (IL-4), Janice Hahn (CA-36), Michael Honda (CA-15), Barbara Lee (CA-9), Zoe Lofgren (CA-16), James McGovern (MA-3), Jan Schakowsky (IL-9), Jackie Speier (CA-12), John Tierney (MA-6), Melvin L. [read post]
On these two issues, he appears concerned that presently the human rights law answer is that—unless their denial would cause severe psychological or endogenous harm—these are not protected activities, whereas it seems to me that this is what adherence to human rights law entails: that we accept its limits, mindful of course that it is constantly evolving and so the answer may change sooner or later. (8) More generally, does not the human rights framework entail that it… [read post]
  But the inability of a State to protect a human right is not necessarily a violation of a human right.[8] It will depend on the reasonableness of a state’s actions in responding to an interference with a right. [read post]
 With respect to Article 8, it may well be that the overlap with psychological harm does not necessarily make for a consistent approach to claims based on that breach. [read post]
  Whether Hathaway and Pobjoy are advancing the notion that harm must always be one or the other is not clear, and if this is their argument, then it certainly does not stand in the face of empirical examples of torture. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:23 am by Susan Brenner
The Davis court noted that the following factors “may be relevant” in determining whether someone was in custody: 1) the number of police officers present, 2) whether the officers were in uniform or had their weapons drawn, 3) what the officers told the individual, i.e., whether he was not under arrest or free to leave, 4) where the questioning occurred, 5) when the questioning occurred, 6) whether the individual was restrained or directed where the questioning would occur,… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
 National Velvet - (1944) (Horse) (Elizibeth Taylor)   8. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 11:00 pm by Adam Wagner
Although the Tribunal which made the initial deportation ruling mentioned Article 8, the reason why he could not be deported had however nothing whatsoever to do with Article 8, but was based on the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006. [read post]