Search for: "Levell v. State" Results 1901 - 1920 of 29,811
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2016, 8:55 am
., the group got back into the Escalade, and Cady drove onto Interstate 805 toward the transition ramp to State Route 52, with the goal of returning back to Bednarski and Rodgers's house.As Cady approached the transition to State Route 52 he was traveling at a high rate of speed, and several of his passengers told him to slow down. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am by Erin Sutton
At the federal level, the Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2008 (the “Ryan Haight Act”) made certain amendments to the Controlled Substances Act that established controls on the remote prescribing of controlled substances. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) has been allowed. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
You have to grasp just how important Levine was to the tort reform crew that is stalled in ramming through more tort reform at the state and local levels and had bet the house on Levine becoming law and killing the plaintiff bar for good. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 11:45 am
A New York Appellate Court recently reversed a trial level decision granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant in the 2009 case of Esther Jacobs v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
The red sole is valid and infringed, says the Court of The HagueChristian Louboutin v Van Haren Schoenen BV C/09/450182 / HA ZA 13-999, Court of The Hague (February 2019)For the first time Retromark strays beyond its UK/EU-level remit, in order to see the legendary red sole saga through to its conclusion in the Dutch courts. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:21 pm
Neugebauer stated that the superiority of this type of proximity analysis was well-established. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:31 pm by Mark Patrick
On May 12, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit addressed the patent eligibility of software in Enfish, LLC v. [read post]