Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 1901 - 1920 of 15,539
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2014, 2:11 am
The leases were subsequently cancelled, but the tenants refused to vacate the premises.The matter was taken to the South Gauteng High Court for the eviction of Masibi Gaitsewe and 14 other tenants (Madulamoho Housing Association v Masibi Gaitsewe and Others (35151 /2012) (2013) ZAGPJHC 49 (11 March 2013).Some 45 families had already been evicted prior to this case. [read post]
10 May 2013, 11:19 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The number of cases briefed and ready to be calendared for argument was at an historic low, so low that calendars sometimes could not be filled. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 3:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The need for renewable, sustainable and low carbon energy solutions to meet growing demand is vital. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:32 am by David Super
  The Act's heavy reliance on Medicaid expansion also sought to save federal costs -- with disastrous results after NFIB v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 11:06 pm by Mark Summerfield
I recently wrote about the decision of the Federal Court of Australia in Repipe Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2019] FCA 1956, in which two innovation patents owned by RePipe were found to be invalid, and thus liable to be revoked, on the ground that neither was for a patent-eligible ‘manner of manufacture’ under Australian law. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
It popped up in a recent Tax Court case, Mitsubishi Cement Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:04 am
The bill would override a notable 2009 court decision, Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:40 pm by Bexis
 But one of the lowest of many low points was when the court ruled a causation opinion based upon FDA adverse event reports (“AERs”) was admissible in a civil trial because the FDA used AERs to assess causation administratively. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:24 pm
 This low threshold, in the context of industrial applicability, was supported by the Supreme Court in HGS v Lilly [2011] UKSC 51 where “plausible” was used alongside “educated guess” and “reasonably credible”. [read post]