Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 5,344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Trump and other defendants as soon as reasonably possible[2-b]. [2-a] This is consistent with and reflected in the book. [2-b] This is not consistent with or reflected in the book. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am
³ The defendant prevailed in the trial court on a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss based on mootness only to see that victory slip away on appeal. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 1:38 am
Grant, JudgeRepresenting Appellants (Defendants): Peter B. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:04 am
The duties of court expert translators, as discharged by experts enrolled in a national register were not covered by the definition of ‘regulated profession’ set out in article 3(1)(a) of Parliament and Council Directive 2005/36/EC of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (OJ 2005 L 255, p 22). [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:12 am
Issue: Whether the antifraud provisions of the United States securities laws extend to transnational frauds where: (a) the foreign-based parent company conducted substantial business in the United States and (b)the claims arose from an accounting fraud perpetrated by American citizens at the parent company's Florida based subsidiary, and whether subject matter jurisdiction extends to transnational fraud-on-the-market claims. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 5:11 am
The person who receives the dividend is the person responsible for paying the tax on the dividend: it doesn’t matter who owns the stock. [read post]
6 May 2020, 9:33 am
Roberts, Esq., Employment Law Counsel Subject Matter Expert CalChamber members can read more about Private Retirement Savings Plans in the HR Library. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 5:07 pm
App. 2004); see also Rideout, 122 P.3d at 210 (citing cases). [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 5:24 pm
Pa. 1954); 22 C.J.S., Criminal Law § 223, p. 574. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 3:18 am
P. 41(b), instead of continuing to state that the counterclaim was viable and that defendants would prosecute the counterclaim through trial, should it not be dismissed. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 6:27 am
P. 12(b)(6) or 56. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Salt Lake County, 583 P.2d 105, 107 (Utah 1978). [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:47 am
Cole, the inventor of the subject matter claimed in the Gaming Patents and a “member” of Patent Rights. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:30 pm
Hence, explained Justice Lemons, § 8.01-581.17 provides only a "qualified privilege similar to the privilege afforded by Rules of Court 4:1(b)(3). [read post]
13 May 2010, 9:42 am
P. 23(b)(3) for the class certification analysis, plaintiffs relied on the report of a purported motorcycle engineering expert. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 12:31 pm
As FRCP 50 makes clear, a 50(a) motion is a prerequisite to a 50(b) motion after the verdict. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 2:38 pm
Ammons from the Energy & Natural Resources Industry Group, Edward B. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 6:54 am
Once you have those savings, you'll be taken care of no matter what happens — a layoff, a loved one's illness, etc. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 10:01 am
Followed closely behind (A) the reason they can’t pay songwriters is because songwriters hide from them (true story, read the F-1 at p. 20); (B) Spotify wants to eliminate the “middleman” (i.e., record companies) and good luck with that; and (C) if the music industry had just built a global rights database then, then everything would be fine so Spotify’s failure to pay royalties is really our fault. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 2:44 pm
The gist of the opinion was that plaintiff's counsel came up with the idea for a B&P 17200 claim against an air filter manufacturer, worked up the case, and then found a plaintiff (via a newspaper ad), who (i) met counsel only on the day of the class rep deposition; (ii) had never read the complaint; and (iii) knew nothing about the case. [read post]
