Search for: "MATTER OF INQUIRY INTO M M" Results 1901 - 1920 of 2,738
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
Justice Department lawyers continued to make the same point in case after case but federal judges, in case after case, rejected it, concluding that the mandate and its penalty were not taxes or actual tax penalties, no matter how they were collected. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 6:55 am by lawmrh
” See “No Laughing Matter: Failing the Giggle Test Might Leave You Crying. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:44 am by Susan Brenner
The convictions for possessing child pornography apparently arose from a search that was conducted after Sample had been arrested for, and I’m guessing here, burglary and/or receiving stolen property and/or identity theft. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 2:52 pm by Mandelman
  And if people are buying that, and it’s working with the bank, then I’m in favor of saying it. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:22 am by Joe Palazzolo
They said they are cooperating with inquiries by government authorities. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:31 pm by KC Johnson
While VT undertook a full inquiry, and changed procedures to make sure that a student like the shooter never again fell through the cracks, Duke appears to have taken the reverse approach. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:06 am by Mandelman
That one thing is known as the “the Pecora Moment,” and it refers to attorney Ferdinand Pecora who, in his role as chief counsel for the United States Senate Committee on Banking and Currency, cross-examined the most famous men in finance as part of the committee’s inquiry into the causes of the crash of 1929. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:27 pm by Keith Gerver
  He requests that the court make an inquiry, obtain a result, and then decide what to do at that point. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:54 am by Michael Scutt
 Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose? [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:14 am by Mark Herrmann
” Now that I’m in-house, I see this even more frequently. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 11:34 am by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Courts addressing claims by public employees who contend that they have been discharged for exercising their right to free speech must employ a two-step inquiry: First, the court must determine whether the speech may be described as “speech on a matter of public concern. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 10:17 am by FDABlog HPM
  Examples include: the government’s crackdown on medical device firms failing to report adverse events, litigation relating to FDA’s import authority, stepped-up enforcement under the False Claims Act, and the latest on investigations and prosecutions related to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and potential SEC inquiries. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm by Michael O'Hear
Coupled with her opinion in Bryant, which I’m about to get to, it seems safe to say that Sotomayor has mixed—perhaps not entirely coherent—feelings about Crawford, and that her addition to the Court may conceivably prove decisive in slowing or halting the so-called Crawford revolution. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:55 am by Susan Brenner
The court admonished the foreperson not to discuss the court's inquiry with the other jurors, and then heard argument on the motion for mistrial. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
I’m less enthralled with the decision in State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm by Kali Borkoski
   Do you think that difference matters in terms of outcomes? [read post]