Search for: "Matter of Simon" Results 1901 - 1920 of 2,302
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Tilley ([2010] BCCA 482) the Court of Appeal of British Columbia upheld an award of damages of Can$30,000 for defamation arising from three articles published in “The Peak”, the Simon Fraser University student newspaper, and on The Peak website. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
With matters of plagiarism like this, there’s often not a cut and dry answer. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm by Editor
Speaking of uprisings, Simon Fodden at Slaw.ca has penned an interesting blog post about Luddites and the Law. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 4:32 am by Emma Snell
” In a letter to the book’s publisher, Simon & Schuster, the district attorney’s office said that the publication of the book could compromise its continuing investigation of former President Trump. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:28 pm by INFORRM
  A Committee chaired by Sir David Calcutt QC (and including Messrs David Eady and Simon Jenkins) was established to investigate press behaviour in respect of personal privacy. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 10:43 am by Megan Carpenter
Simon Tam is an activist and founder of the band The Slants, an Asian-American rock band committed to advocacy for, and raising awareness of discrimination against, Asian-Americans. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 2:18 pm by Inu Manak
For instance, in 2020, Simon Lester and I suggested that STCs could provide useful in a newly established committee on national security. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 11:56 pm by INFORRM
A Reynolds privilege defence will succeed if the allegation in issue concerns a matter of public interest and the person who researched the story behaved responsibly in reaching the conclusions set out in it. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 3:01 am by jonathanturley
As a threshold matter, I want to note that I am aware of conservative sites reviewed by NewsGuard that have been given favorable ratings. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 4:18 am by Gwendolyn Whidden
Simon Romero and Emiliano Rodriguez Mega report for the New York Times. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 4:41 am by jonathanturley
As a message, F*** Joe Biden or its equivalent does not seek to engage the listener over matters of public concern in a manner that seeks to expand knowledge and promote understanding. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 3:24 am by jonathanturley
The answer: It is, and has been, clearly established that public employees have a right to speak “on a matter of public concern regarding issues outside of one’s day-to-day job responsibilities, absent a showing that Pickering balancing favors the government’s particular interest in promoting efficiency or public safety. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:13 am
An attorney whom you have used in the past for other matters, or other well-known attorneys in your area, may be able to suggest attorneys who primarily handle cases involving brain injury. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Dodgy newsgathering has taken place at some papers and journalists weigh trauma matter-of-factly, sometimes brutally. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 5:07 am by Beatrice Yahia
Simon Lewis and Humeyra Pamuk report for Reuters. [read post]
15 May 2015, 6:05 am by Simon Fodden
But it couldn’t matter. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:41 am by Menachem Z. Rosensaft
Yahel Vilan, the Israeli ambassador to Serbia, recently told the Russian State-owned news agency Sputnik that applying the term “genocide” to the July 1995 mass killings of more than 8,000 Bosnian Muslim (Bosniak) men and boys in and around the town of Srebrenica in eastern Bosnia presented a distorted picture of the events in question. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In upholding the defence of qualified privilege, Simon Brown LJ said that it did not matter whether one characterised the Bar Council as owing a duty to the recipients of the communications or whether the situation was characterised as one where the parties shared a common interest in maintaining professional standards. [read post]