Search for: "Means v. State"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 61,667
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2012, 12:06 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
The case is State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:08 am
Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Co Ltd and others; Nokia Corpn v Revenue and Customs Comrs (Internationak Trademark Association intervening) (Joined Cases C-446/09 and C-495/09); [2011] WLR (D) 349 “Goods coming from a non-EU state which were imitations of goods protected in the European Union by a trade mark or copies of goods protected in the EU by copyright could not be classified as “counterfeit goods” within the… [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 1:30 pm
Saying that a state court holding is not adequate and independent does not mean that the state court erred. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
It's also consistent with the Landrian v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:30 am
The case is United States of America v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:51 am
Thirdly, Lord Hoffmann considered that the best way to keep the tort within reasonable bounds was by giving a narrow meaning to unlawful means. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:01 pm
Arlington v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
A public educational institution is not an “education corporation” within the meaning of New York State’s Human Rights LawGarcia v City Univ. of N.Y., 2016 NY Slip Op 01271, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSupreme Court dismissed Minerva Garcia's disability discrimination claims brought against the City University of New York pursuant to New York’s Executive Law §296(4), the State’s Human Rights Law (HRL).The Appellate… [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Evenwel v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 6:37 am
Supreme Court case called Salinas v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 6:37 am
Supreme Court case called Salinas v. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 4:48 pm
In this Viewpoint, we explain the Dobbs ruling and what it means for physicians, public health, and society. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
District Judge Bolton enjoined enforcement of various provisions, a decision later upheld by the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am
There is some authority on this point from the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:58 pm
Today, in a particularly interesting context, the issues was before the Supreme Court in the case of Danforth v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 1:22 pm
This can mean several things. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 2:30 pm
Case citation: Trout Point Lodge Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
Grutter v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am
The courts are also disinclined to decide Article 14 cases on the basis that the comparators are not in an analogous situation other than in very obvious cases: see R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37. [read post]
