Search for: "Parker v. Parker"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 2,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, November 05, 2008 Parker v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
Neuroscientists Larry Cahill, James McGaugh, and Elizabeth Parker discovered that a small number of people are able to recall detailed moment-to-moment events from their entire lives. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:53 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, November 05, 2008 Parker v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 9:09 am
Edwin Cruz v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:10 am
. : Published for the Parker School of Foreign and Comparative Law, Columbia University in the City of New York by Oceana Publications, 1990 K 85 S95 1990 Charles Szladits’ Guide to foreign legal materials : German by Timothy Kearley, Wolfram Fischer. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm
” She also wants to know whether the opinion of the three-judge appeals panel conflicts with Parker v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 9:44 am
In State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:21 am
Carter v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:23 am
Bilski v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:00 am
PARKER AND CITY OF HOUSTON, No. 13-0047 Set to be argued on February 24, 2015 Previously: Two opinions, one rehearing grant, and six grants (March 23, 2014) PLAINS EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 10:31 am
Parker, 277 N.C. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:46 am
What fascinates me is how the plaintiff's credibility was ripped apart at trial but he still won the case.The case is Wiercinski v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:27 am
This, in a nutshell, is the question which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had been required to answer in Constantin Film v YouTube, C-264/19.The referral, which Germany’s Federal Court of Justice had made, focused on the interpretation of Article 8(2)(a) of the Enforcement Directive, a piece of EU legislation adopted in 2004.The background national proceedings had originated from the refusal, by YouTube and its parent company Google, to provide film producer… [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:17 pm
Take, for example, Roe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 3:25 pm
OLLANTA HUMALA TASSO Presidente de la República ALDO VÁSQUEZ RÍOS Ministro de Justicia y Derechos Humanos MIS RAZONES "ASÍ COMO TAMBIÉN QUE ES LA PRIMERA VEZ QUE COMETE UN DELITO EN DONDE EL BIEN JURÍDICO PROTEGIDO ES DE MÍNIMA LESIVIDAD" El "bien jurídico protegido" en nuestro caso es el RESPETO A LA AUTORIDAD, según esta resolución es de "mínima lesividad", NO puede… [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 11:00 pm
The jury certainly felt that way, awarding the plaintiffs $181,000 in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages.The Court of Appeals (Parker, Lynch and Nathan) resolves a number of issues:1. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:31 am
John's University student who claims he was falsely accused of sexual misconduct cannot sue the university for sex discrimination under Title IX because the complaint does not plausibly assert that the university ruled against him because he is a male.The case is Roe v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:37 pm
The City also cites Wills v Amerada Hess Corp. in support of dismissal. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:21 am
(Cohen, v. 2, p. 9.) [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:44 am
., Parker v. [read post]
