Search for: "Parker v. Parker" Results 1901 - 1920 of 2,350
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2012, 1:07 pm by Keith B. Hall
The case against Range arises out of complaints by the owners of two water wells in Parker County, Texas, which is in the Dallas/Fort Worth area. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
Advising inventors, their spouses, and their start-up companies: James Joyce v Armstrong Teasdale (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Use of patent reexamination evidence in parallel litigation: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v Primarion Inc (Patents Post-Grant) District Court E D California: Government’s approval of false marking settlement precludes later challenge that settlement was “staged” and therefore lacks preclusive effect: Champion… [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 9:40 am
Parker, 260, 6326/04, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 2671; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:12 am by Peter Huang
Neuroscientists Larry Cahill, James McGaugh, and Elizabeth Parker discovered that a small number of people are able to recall detailed moment-to-moment events from their entire lives. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
John's University student who claims he was falsely accused of sexual misconduct  cannot sue the university for sex discrimination under Title IX because the complaint does not plausibly assert that the university ruled against him because he is a male.The case is Roe v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
What fascinates me is how the plaintiff's credibility was ripped apart at trial but he still won the case.The case is Wiercinski v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:37 pm
The City also cites Wills v Amerada Hess Corp. in support of dismissal. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:17 pm by Larry
Take, for example, Roe v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:27 am by Eleonora Rosati
This, in a nutshell, is the question which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had been required to answer in Constantin Film v YouTube, C-264/19.The referral, which Germany’s Federal Court of Justice had made, focused on the interpretation of Article 8(2)(a) of the Enforcement Directive, a piece of EU legislation adopted in 2004.The background national proceedings had originated from the refusal, by YouTube and its parent company Google, to provide film producer… [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 3:25 pm by José Guillermo
OLLANTA HUMALA TASSO Presidente de la República ALDO VÁSQUEZ RÍOS Ministro de Justicia y Derechos Humanos MIS RAZONES "ASÍ COMO TAMBIÉN QUE ES LA PRIMERA VEZ QUE COMETE UN DELITO EN DONDE EL BIEN JURÍDICO PROTEGIDO ES DE MÍNIMA LESIVIDAD" El "bien jurídico protegido" en nuestro caso es el RESPETO A LA AUTORIDAD, según esta resolución es de "mínima lesividad", NO puede… [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 11:00 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The jury certainly felt that way, awarding the plaintiffs $181,000 in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages.The Court of Appeals (Parker, Lynch and Nathan) resolves a number of issues:1. [read post]