Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 15,265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
The Court of Appeal today gave judgment in the case of ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 439). [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
People v. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 9:53 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:35 am
The European Court of Justice has finally ruled on the landmark case of L’Oréal v eBay (C-324/09) . [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:57 pm
The final section of this year’s report offers a new perspective on shifting global balances of economic and trade power as a result of autocratization. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:02 am
It’s about power. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:02 am
Disclosure: a speaker, yesterday, at a lecture I attended used the Henry 2 v Henry 8 line to describe the possible results, saying that, of course, the decision wouldn’t be put quite that way. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 1:45 pm
Jones v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:25 am
In Lamone v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:30 am
EFF is a member-supported nonprofit, powered by donations from individuals around the world. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm
Reno v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:50 pm
Common law said citizens must be born where the sovereign exercises power. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 10:30 am
The recent case of People of the State of New York v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 8:04 am
NosalFacebook Gets Decisive Win Against Pseudo-Competitor Power VenturesCourt Finds That the Value of Bartered-For Services Constitutes Loss Under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act -- Animators at Law v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 10:37 pm
., that informed me about two items concerning Diana Levine -- named plaintiff in the relatively well-known Wyeth v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:25 pm
Florida a replay of United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 4:00 am
That's because under NLRB v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
[4] McGirt v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
By Eric SegallDuring the Supreme Court's oral argument in Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:16 am
Davis v. [read post]
