Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 3,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2014, 9:21 am
In a recent wrongful death case, CGL Management, LLC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 2:38 pm
Judge Michael Levanas, of the Los Angeles Superior Court, recently announced that he would not exclude Ballmer from the trial. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:15 pm
The Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al., Real Parties In Interest (2014) ___ Cal.4th ___, Case No. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 5:02 am
They were telling them how much money was there, how many people -- or how many victims might be there. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 9:57 am
The most difficult case for the court to harmonize is State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:03 am
In 2012, I blogged about the important decision of Hussein v The Labour Court [2012] IEHC 364. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:23 am
American Meat Institute v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
Nonetheless, people are intrigued with the idea of incorporating in Delaware. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Code § 3370.1 (stats. 1972, ch. 1084, p. 2021), cited in People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
The case in the higher court is nominally Jones v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
The superiority of judges as fact finders in complex scientific cases remains to be shown. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 2:31 pm
Demag v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:12 am
Stas in 2012 appears to have adopted a three-part test defined by the Superior Court, Appellate Division in 1988’s State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:41 pm
Much less letting other people see 'em.But guess what? [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Today’s case is Dimieri v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 3:00 am
” Kendall-Jackson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
At least 147 people were sickened and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm
At least 147 people were sickened, and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
Another way to categorize is to emphasize proceedings commonly heard in the Provincial Court instead of the Superior Court of Justice.[6] Naturally, there is considerable overlap in the concepts identified below to all levels of court but it is the purpose of this paper to illustrate how the most common forms of wrongful convictions and the reasons thereof are crystallised most at levels short of high-profile offences. 2. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
Another way to categorize is to emphasize proceedings commonly heard in the Provincial Court instead of the Superior Court of Justice.[6] Naturally, there is considerable overlap in the concepts identified below to all levels of court but it is the purpose of this paper to illustrate how the most common forms of wrongful convictions and the reasons thereof are crystallised most at levels short of high-profile offences. 2. [read post]
