Search for: "Robinson v. State" Results 1901 - 1920 of 2,077
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2018, 5:27 am by Amy Heerink, Attorney, O'Hagan Meyer
Moreover, as recently as 2016, the supreme court reaffirmed in Robinson v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In a post titled Dickens's 1842 Reading Tour: Launching the Copyright Question in Tempestuous Seas , Philip V. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” At On the Docket, Stephen Saltzburg highlights some of the questions remaining after the court’s decision in Kansas v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:27 am by Amy Heerink, Attorney, O'Hagan Meyer
Moreover, as recently as 2016, the supreme court reaffirmed in Robinson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star (Sheffield)… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
"[A] court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not waivable, but may be [raised] at any stage of the action, and the court may, ex mero motu [on its own motion], at any time, when attention is called to the facts, refuse to proceed further and dismiss the action'" (Matter of Fry v Village of Tarrytown, 89 NY2d 714, 718, quoting Robinson v Oceanic Steam Nav. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:32 am by Jeremy
This issue that has been debated by copyright experts over the years because, it is argued, the destruction of an artwork may or may not have a negative impact on the reputation of the artist – the test established by Article 6bis of the Berne Convention, and mirrored in most copyright laws in the world, for claiming a violation of the artist’s right of integrity (in the context of Amar Nath Sehgal v Union of India, I commented: “destruction of a work can prejudice an… [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The decision is AFSCME District Council 37 Health & Security Fund v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 1:49 pm by Roy Black
She sold 3 vials of crack to Robinson, who was working undercover. [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:54 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
  The Ontario Superior Court did certify a class proceedings on waiver of tort in 2009 in the ongoing case of Robinson v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 2:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  Where bail is refused the reasons are to be stated in open court. [read post]