Search for: "State v House"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 28,759
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2023, 4:00 am
Individuals with law degrees occupy roughly half the state governorships, more than half the seats in the United States Senate, and more than a third of the seats in the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Youngstown and United States v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:26 pm
In Lassiter v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:50 am
Additional Resources: McKennon v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:49 am
" Her endorsement of a relatively narrow definition of "public use" that excludes private "economic development" takings is at odds with her opinion for the Court in Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:08 am
And although the one Supreme Court case to address the underpinnings of Amd14, 1935's Perry v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:43 am
The First Department clapped back at the Second Department in Estate of Murphy, v New York City Hous. [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:47 am
The case is Noble House, L.L.C. v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 6:34 am
Following a lengthy period of “ping-pong”, conflicts between the two Houses were ultimately resolved on 26 April 2023 when the House of Lords voted not to insist on amendments the House of Commons disagreed with. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:57 am
The bill’s co-sponsors wrote a memo detailing the importance of the legislation, saying: In the landmark 2020 decision Bostock v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 5:40 pm
Gore decision in 2000 that handed the White House to President George W. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:51 pm
State and Federal Charges of Money Laundering using Cryptocurrency Money laundering has been defined as a felony crime by Texas state law and federal statute. [read post]
2 May 2023, 10:42 am
However, narrow tailoring is not confined to strict scrutiny cases, as seen in McCullen v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:40 am
Fund v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am
The Court will consider when should a mandatory order against a local housing authority be made to enforce a duty owed to a homeless individual under s193(2) of the Housing Act 1996 (the “1996 Act”)? [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The notice also states that taking unfair advantage of an opposing party (e.g., capitalising on a party’s lack of legal knowledge or representation), applying undue pressure or oppressive tactics, or preventing a party from keeping a copy of the NDA, would be a breach of a solicitor’s regulatory obligations. [read post]
1 May 2023, 11:20 am
Querino v Cambridge City Council. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am
Many other states, including California, Nebraska, Illinois, and Florida, have similar statutes. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 8:38 am
This decision follows on from the January 2021 Grand Chamber judgment in Georgia v. [read post]
