Search for: "State v. Austin"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 2,710
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 8:13 am
The landmark 1963 United States Supreme Court decision Brady v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 10:36 am
Section 254.004(a) of the Texas Estates Code provides as follows: (a) A contract executed or entered into on or after September 1, 1979, to make a will or devise, or not to revoke a will or devise, may be established only by: (1) a written agreement that is binding and enforceable; or (2) a will stating: (A) that a contract exists; and (B) the material provisions of the contract. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, No. 17-0200 TRACY WINDRUM, INDIVIDUALLY, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF LANCER WINDRUM... v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:54 am
In his book, Tatel wrote that Ginsburg told him about the behind-the-scenes dealings in a 2009 case, known as Northwest Austin v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:25 pm
Pearson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:06 am
In the US, (i) Case3:15-cr-00201-WHO, United States of America v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
However, the Court then wound up ruling narrowly in that case — Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:46 am
Texas, Austin Div. 04-CA-550 LY. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:00 am
As Schleicher notes, Vermont has a smaller population than 28 cities in the United States (including Austin, Texas, whose metropolitan area is approximately three times the population of Vermont) and 107 counties. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am
Austin, 14-271. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
Discussing oral argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Austin, 14-271, a state-on-top habeas case from the Fourth Circuit, asks whether a reviewing court may presume that a trial judge acted “vindictively” in giving a defendant a higher sentence after resentencing, when no higher court had vacated the trial judge’s original sentence. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
" In Regan v. [read post]
6 Feb 2025, 6:43 am
” Austin v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:50 am
Supreme Court in Connick v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 8:48 am
Protecting privacy: Beyond the ConstitutionMost legal privacy protections in federal law arise from statutes, not Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, and scholar Erin Murphy has helpfully compiled and analyzed those statutory provisions, noting that "at least four Supreme Court justices recently suggested in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:41 am
Baron recalled that the Texas Supreme Court observed in O’Neal v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 2:11 pm
In the May post, I reported that Springsteen's conviction had been overturned because prosecutors introduced portions of Scott's confession at Springsteen's trial without giving Springsteen the chance to cross-examine Scott, a practice now outlawed by the United States Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
