Search for: "United States v. Container Corp."
Results 1901 - 1920
of 2,081
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Nonetheless, several decisions in England and the United States offer insight into the handling and resolution of disputes involving Bermuda Form policies. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 3:13 pm
In Dahlia v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 6:55 am
Passenger Corp., 2019 WL 5087594 (N.D. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The answer is complex, simply because it depends on: the actual compensation arrangement being proposed the application of federal law (including Stark and anti kickback rules) to the extent it applies and state law governing self-referral, fee-splitting, kickbacks, and patient brokering Federal law contains numerous exceptions to Stark and "safe harbors" under anti-kickback law. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 12:39 pm
United States, 564 F.3d 1374, 1381 (Fed. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
Two questions stand out in particular: (1) can the jury consider appraisal reports that contain comparable sales of property that occurred after the date of taking; and (2) can the jury consider evidence that the property was actually rezoned after the date of taking, as evidence that the property was likely to be rezoned at the date of taking? [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
The search results contained book titles and page numbers containing the relevant terms. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 4:30 am
Johnson & Johnson Corp. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 8:20 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
See Champion Int’l Corp., 762 S.W.2d at 899; Johnson, 700 S.W.2d at 918. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:30 pm
The Sixth Circuit considers such agreements per se illegal, see In re Cardizem CD Antitrust Litig., 332 F.3d 896 (6th Cir. 2003), the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice both consider them presumptively anticompetitive, see In re Schering Plough Corp., No. 9297 (F.T.C. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The inspection also revealed the company failed to adequately maintain secondary containment and failed to promptly remove accumulated oil from field drainage systems. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
Instead, he agrees with the logic and methodology approved in Matter of Murphy (United States Dredging Corp.), 74 AD3d 815 (2d Dept 2010) (read here my post on Murphy), requiring a present value computation of the gains taxes to be paid at a projected future date, here, at the end of the assumed 10-year holding period. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
Clear Lam Packaging failed to have a hazardous waste storage permit, maintain aisle space in the hazardous waste storage area, keep hazardous waste containers closed, provide annual employee training and keep records about it, and have a complete contingency plan. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
Clear Lam Packaging failed to have a hazardous waste storage permit, maintain aisle space in the hazardous waste storage area, keep hazardous waste containers closed, provide annual employee training and keep records about it, and have a complete contingency plan. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:55 am
SPRAWLDEF v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:53 am
v. [read post]
