Search for: "Walker v. Walker" Results 1901 - 1920 of 3,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
  Here, in the quote taken from Walker v Kramer ; 2009 NY Slip Op 04414 ;  Decided on June 2, 2009 ;  Appellate Division, Second Department we see a situation in which neither defendant demonstrated their right to dismissal. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The “selection of one among several reasonable courses of action does not constitute malpractice” (Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738), and an attorney may not be held liable for “‘the exercise of appropriate judgment that leads to an unsuccessful result'” (Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 846-847, quoting Rubinberg v Walker, 252 AD2d 466, 467). [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 3:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Furthermore, she failed to establish that she had a potentially meritorious cause of action (see generally Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738; Allen v Potruch, 282 AD2d 484, 484-485; Iannacone v Weidman, 273 AD2d 275, 276-277; Rubinberg v Walker, 252 AD2d 466, 467). [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am by Amy Howe
Gans weighs in on the argument in Armstrong v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm by Blog Editorial
In Courtroom 2, on Thursday 16 June 2011, the case of R v Smith will be heard by Lords Phillips, Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Collins and Lord Wilson. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:14 am by Lyle Denniston
Walker of San Francisco striking down the marriage ban under the federal Constitution. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 4:48 pm by Lawrence Solum
Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, and its scholarly treatment, as emblematic. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:32 am by Lawrence Solum
Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, and its scholarly treatment, as emblematic. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:34 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Tuesday 24 April 2012 are the linked appeals of R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, and Secretary of State for the Home Department v Munir and anor, which are listed for three days to be heard by a panel of five (L Hope, L Walker, L Clarke, L Dyson and L Wilson). [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” See In re Licores Veracruz, supra(finding that rum and cigars meet the criteria of relatedness).See also John Walker & Sons Ltd. v. [read post]