Search for: "-LRA Wells v. King"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 3,280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2014, 4:07 pm
"It is well settled that the mere presence of an individual at a scene of criminal activity without any other indicia of criminal activity is insufficient to establish probable cause as held in People v Sanchez. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:40 am
Productions v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
Hurles opens the field for the next Relist King. [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:45 am
” Weider v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:30 pm
The unconstitutionality of such a statute has been clear since Buckley v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
To switch gears from the First Amendment to Article One, a comparable switch may well occur when the subject turns to the constitutionality of Congressional-executive agreements that serve as the modern vehicle for committing America to international free-trade regimes. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:15 am
Given that a number of divorce attorneys (and those with no such expertise) have opined about the family law legal consequences of this tragi-comedy, I figured I might weigh in as well. [read post]
20 May 2014, 2:31 pm
" The defendant further stated, in response to the Supreme Court's inquiry, that although he had previously been confined to a hospital for mental illness, he now felt well psychologically. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
After Barry Goldwater gave the nation a “choice, not an echo” by voting against the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Lyndon Johnson rightly claimed that his landslide victory in the presidential election gave him a “popular mandate” for further breakthrough initiatives.Martin Luther King Jr. then set the stage by throwing his support behind the campaign for voting rights in Selma – which was soon generating shocking scenes of escalating series of vicious… [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:20 pm
In Bond v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:21 pm
Miller Starr Regalia has had a well-established reputation as a leading real estate law firm for over forty-five years. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:00 am
In State v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The Ninth Circuit said no, in Dariano v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 12:38 pm
Thus, the court remits the matter to the Supreme Court for a new determination as to the husband's monthly income, as well as the appropriate child support and concomitant child support arrears based on such income based on Coull v Rottman. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:13 am
This is a point that many thinkers have made (in a recent essay I referred to the positive v. negative peace and direct v. structural violence concepts of Martin Luther King, Jr. and John Galtung). [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Well, maybe not. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
King. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
King. [read post]
1 May 2014, 2:28 pm
” King, 131 S.Ct. at 1862. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm
King’s “death and the disorders that followed [that] led to irresistible pressure for speedy passage of the Senate-voted bill,” and that “[h]ad the vote not occurred under the shadow of the King assassination, the outcome might well have been different. [read post]
