Search for: "CF-3"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 2,385
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2010, 4:11 pm
(3) If question 2 is answered in the negative, what are the relevant criteria for distinguishing non-microbiological plant production processes excluded from patent protection under A 53(b) from non-excluded ones? [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 10:23 am
(Cf. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:37 am
[1] Cf. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 8:22 am
Cf. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 8:41 am
The purposes of this comprehensive scheme are threefold: (1) to provide the creditor/beneficiary with a quick, inexpensive and6efficient remedy against a defaulting debtor/trustor; (2) to protect the debtor/trustor from wrongful loss of the property; and (3) to ensure that a properly conducted sale is final between the parties and conclusive as to a bona fide purchaser. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:40 pm
Factor No 3. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
” Under the GLBA, financial institutions are required to “establish appropriate standards” to safeguard a customer’s personal financial information, in order: “(1) to insure the security and confidentiality of customer records and information; (2) to protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such records; and (3) to protect against unauthorized access to or use of such records or information which could result in… [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
The same argument can be made with regard to employers' being the arbiter of truth as to their employees' own speech (said on the employees' own behalf, and not on behalf of the employer). [3] See, e.g., C. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:27 pm
Cf. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:24 pm
No. 66-1307, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. (1980), 3-4. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:23 am
Calvao v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:22 am
Ed. 2d 665 (1995); cf. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
The applicant appealed against the decision of the Examining Division (ED) refusing the application under consideration. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
As state courts and officials in Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Minnesota, Texas and elsewhere modify state election rules to accommodate the unprecedented challenges that COVID-19 has presented, some argue that their actions are unconstitutional.[2] Justice Amy Coney Barrett has not yet weighed in on the issue, and the remaining Justices appear to be evenly divided.[3] As an originalist matter, the Supreme Court should stay out of these cases. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
As state courts and officials in Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Minnesota, Texas and elsewhere modify state election rules to accommodate the unprecedented challenges that COVID-19 has presented, some argue that their actions are unconstitutional.[2] Justice Amy Coney Barrett has not yet weighed in on the issue, and the remaining Justices appear to be evenly divided.[3] As an originalist matter, the Supreme Court should stay out of these cases. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
"[3] Even if e-mail systems aren't forbidden from being the censors of their users' communications, the law shouldn't pressure them into becoming such censors. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
Adkins, Nos. 2011 CF 002001, et al., slip op. at 14 (Fla. 12th Cir. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 10:41 pm
(Though, you should still donate to CF research.) [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:09 pm
Cf. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
It certainly offends Article 6 ECHR, and the Convention has been regarded as part of the English and a European ordre public (Loizidou v Turkey (Article 50), para 48; In re J [2005] UKHL 40, [2006] 1 AC 80, para 44); the Convention is also, in any event, based also on age-old rules of English law (cf. [read post]
