Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 1921 - 1940 of 13,945
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2007, 2:55 pm
The chairmen of two House committees and three former members of the Securities and Exchange Commission -- including two who chaired the agency -- have asked the Supreme Court to let them join in the case of Stoneridge Investment v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Similarly, neither the filing an appeal from an administrative decision in accordance with a grievance procedure [Matter of Matter of Hazeltine v City of New York, 89 AD3d 613] nor a request for reconsideration of a final administrative decision [Cappellino v Town of Somers, 83 AD3d 934] toll the running of the statute of limitations for bringing an Article 78 action.** §36 of the Public Officer Law sets out the procedures for the removal of a town,… [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Similarly, neither the filing an appeal from an administrative decision in accordance with a grievance procedure [Matter of Matter of Hazeltine v City of New York, 89 AD3d 613] nor a request for reconsideration of a final administrative decision [Cappellino v Town of Somers, 83 AD3d 934] toll the running of the statute of limitations for bringing an Article 78 action.** §36 of the Public Officer Law sets out the procedures for the removal of a town,… [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am by Matrix Law
Zubaydah v Foreign and Commonwealth Office and others, heard 14th June 2023. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:40 am by Howard Friedman
 The court held that plaintiff had no more administrative remedies because the warden had promised to investigate his claim.In Spears v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:27 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 4574 (D MD, Jan. 10, 2019), a Maryland federal district court dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies a complaint by a Christian inmate that serving him turkey sausages made with pork stock violated his religious beliefs.In Bell v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”As a procedural matter, the court first explained that it would treat this appeal as one that had been transferred here by the Supreme Court and would review the administrative determination de novo * The standard of review in an administrative determination made after a hearing is limited to the Appellate Division's considering whether the determination was supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by Alan E. Sherman
In doing so, the Court emphasized that, in most situations, the Comptroller’s office can’t interpret the agency’s own administrative rule in a way that’s contrary to the clear, unambiguous text of the rule. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 10:36 am
Thus, reading “authorized holder” under the Executive Order to include a Judicial officer, and allowing such an officer to overrule the Executive’s determinations, would itself be contrary to the authority outlined above. [read post]