Search for: "Cross v. Cross"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 21,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2012, 8:45 am
Eugene Kontorovich, guest-blogging) In discussions of Kiobel v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:36 pm
Cross-posted at CPRBlog. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:17 pm
Chief Justice Roberts in Holder v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 11:58 am
Case Citation: Beastie Boys v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 7:28 am
In State of Tennessee v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 8:41 am
Here is the opinion in State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:33 pm
Sasson v Setina Mfg. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:09 pm
SHATTUCK, and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, Appellees and Cross-Appellants, v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 2:28 pm
In State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:40 pm
TroupFailure to convert indeterminate sentence (appeal)Jurisdiction to grant discharge under K.S.A. 60-1507 (cross appeal)State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 6:31 am
After assessing the evidence presented (and tested on cross-examination) by the lawyers for both parties, and hearing the closing arguments made by... [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 8:05 am
v=F6In0OUvQm8 Continue reading → [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 9:05 am
Introduced by Will Baude, Driver guest-posted at the Volokh Conspiracy in September on why the Supreme Court has made a difference; the high-water mark and retreat of student speech rights; corporal punishment; Plyler v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 11:31 am
Division of Youth and Family Services v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 8:54 pm
The case went to the Ninth Circuit at the preliminary injunction stage but there was no appeal after the district court decided the cross-motions for summary judgment. [read post]
31 May 2007, 4:54 am
The court prohibited defense counsel from discussing the testimony with his client.In United States v. [read post]
Georgia Military School Faces Civil Lawsuit Over Alleged Physical, Sexual Abuse of 12-Year-Old Cadet
7 Dec 2018, 12:55 pm
L.A. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 12:03 am
Sixth Circuit SEAL.gif On defense claim that the defendant did not affirmatively consent but only "acquiesced" to the search, defense counsel's use of the word "acquiesced" in cross-examining the officer was inadmissible under FRE 701 for attempting to force the officer to adopt a legal conclusion, in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:05 am
Centanni v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 7:01 am
This section includes a discussion of the following topics: (i) proposed amendments to the implementation of the Pillar 2 requirements of the Basel III framework in the CRD IV; (ii) cross-border waiver for prudential requirements; (iii) implementation of International Financial Reporting Standard 9; (iv) additional deductions and adjustments to Common Equity Tier 1 capital; and (v) intermediate EU parent undertaking; and implementation of internationally agreed supervisory… [read post]
