Search for: "In Interest of C."
Results 1921 - 1940
of 42,070
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2023, 8:57 am
(§15064.4(c).) [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:52 am
Bill C-56 expands these powers in two important ways. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
Their interest is not abstract; providers have an economic and reputational interest in standing up for their users’ privacy rights. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 4:37 am
§ 130-1.1 (c). [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 3:33 am
To register for updates on the colloquium, please indicate your interest here. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 12:25 pm
Interest rates will stabilize at some point and at some future time likely drop but specifics were unclear. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
EXPERT ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY As has been the practice in previous editions, we have assembled a number of timely and incisive articles by nationally known legal experts and commentators on a host of interesting topics. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
‘This is very interesting as it seems to go beyond the intention of the UPC Agreement (…). [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
‘This is very interesting as it seems to go beyond the intention of the UPC Agreement (…). [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
A recent report from Human Rights Watch and subsequent investigations by journalists tell an all-too-familiar story: the U.S. military trained Saudi border guards accused of killing hundreds of Ethiopian migrants and asylum seekers crossing the border between Saudi Arabia and Yemen. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
Whenever required in the interests of judicial protection, the Court is prepared to correct or complete rules which limit its powers in the name of the principle which defines its mission”. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:20 pm
It’s especially abhorrent when partisans take advantage of such confusion to push their policy agendas of the moment and pursue their personal self-interests. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:32 am
Conclusion Both cases have appeals pending before the Federal Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, and, despite the differences in some of the underlying discussion and conclusions, it will be interesting to see how the court of appeals is going approach the evidence produced in these lawsuits. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 6:07 am
Crucially, though, "[c]ommunity disagreement which results in embarrassment is not enough to support the use of pseudonyms. [read post]
CJEU considers exclusive distribution agreement between infringers sufficient for joint jurisdiction
19 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
Regarding the criterion ‘same situation of law’, the CJEU referred to its Nintendo decision (C‑24/16 and C‑25/16, discussed here), in which it held that this condition is fulfilled where claims are based on a Community design right because it has effect throughout the EU. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
… "Civility matters not simply because lawyers are examples to others on how to engage competing ideas and interests. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:11 pm
This document has been amended over time, and the most recent iteration can be found online at the IARC website.[3] IARC claims to build its classifications upon “consensus” evaluations, based in turn upon considerations of (a) the strength of evidence of carcinogenicity in humans, (b) the evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental (non-human) animals, and (c) the mechanistic evidence of carcinogenicity. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:17 pm
The process by which the court made that determination should be of interest to corporate law practitioners. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 11:28 am
In these cases, it will be up to the individual States to seek public interest waivers for the BABA requirements. 4. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 8:42 am
Donny C. [read post]
