Search for: "In Re: Mark M."
Results 1921 - 1940
of 7,663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2010, 3:53 pm
It was worthy of posting here, as well, so that's exactly what I'm doing. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:45 am
To the fan, they’re getting an inferior product,” Danias said. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:54 am
To the fan, they’re getting an inferior product,” Danias said. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:04 am
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 9:45 am
I'm so glad you asked. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:44 pm
I’m more offended as a feminist. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Mark Lemley: Why now? [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 7:52 pm
Ivan Seidenberg may well be as good a CEO for the “next Facebook” as a would-be Mark Zuckerberg. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
But I have to get back to the cold hard truth because I’m not here to placate people. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:12 am
I’m proactive in the way that I accomplish that – and I’m happy to share if you’re ever curious about how you can do so too. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:44 pm
Modified, revised, or substantively amended opinions will keep the vendor-neutral citation of their original opinion, but will be marked with an “M” to indicate changes, e.g., “2012 CO 1M”. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:44 pm
Modified, revised, or substantively amended opinions will keep the vendor-neutral citation of their original opinion, but will be marked with an “M” to indicate changes, e.g., “2012 CO 1M”. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 1:31 pm
By Inimai M. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm
(Reexamination Alert) District Court M D Tennessee: Defendants’ allegation of fraud is one reason to deny motion to stay pending re-examination: Protective Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 8:45 pm
Eigentlich hatte das Deutsche Patent- und Markenamt (DPMA) im März 2018 die Löschung der umstrittenen Marke beschlossen. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:04 pm
I’m writing to let you know that before you pick your brand or mark though, you should ensure no one else has already used the mark. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 3:23 am
[Yes]TTAB Finds PATIO BY THE SPADES Confusable With KATE SPADE for Clothing and HandbagsDespite Purchaser Sophistication, TTAB Upholds Section 2(d) Refusal of HARDROK EQUIPMENT INC.Despite Weakness of Opposer's Mark, TTAB Finds SHARED SPACE Confusable WIth SHARED for Coworking Spaces"M" for Mattresses Confusable with Three Stylized "M" Marks for Furniture, Says TTABTTAB Reverses "GROW WITH US" Refusal, Finding Live Plants Not… [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:55 am
However, non-use of a mark can constitute abandonment, leading to cancellation of the mark. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 6:23 am
I’m just suggesting that it’s an open question, and I’m critiquing Ben for treating with such apparent disdain those of us who believe the government’s case has not yet been proven. [read post]
11 May 2022, 2:50 pm
I’m not sure, but it should be fun trying. [read post]
