Search for: "In the Matter of Anderson"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 3,082
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2012, 1:32 pm
I would like to respond to a series of related posts made by Ken Anderson, Giovanni Sartor, Lawrence Solum, and James Grimmelmann during the LTAAA symposium. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 1:47 pm
Instead, in the past prosecutors have essentially been granted a free pass, no matter how egregious the conduct. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
Moreover, the majority does not consider the Supreme Court's most recent decision on the issue of agent liability in employee retaliation matters, Staub v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:01 am
“Rather, they are deemed false as a matter of law based on judicial constructions of the FCA,” Trenga wrote. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:35 am
As a matter of legal requirements, however, it does not appear that simple. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 10:47 am
” Anderson v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 11:15 am
I think he’s right about that, and right to emphasize it as a matter of good faith. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:37 pm
UPDATE: Ken Anderson and Paul Rosenzweig have further thoughts on Koh’s speech here and here. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:28 am
Associates who were members of the distribution network include: JEREMY SCOTT ALLEN, CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON, VICTOR BURNS, LOREN DWYER, TAYSHAWN FIELDS, RAVEN FUENTES, MATTHEW GARCIA, VICTOR GONZALEZ, ZAKIYYAH HOULKER, BRUCE JACKSON, JEROME JACKSON, DUANE KIRBY, LUIS LIMA, JOSHUA MARTIN, DANIEL MISCHIYEV, KENNETH ORTIZ, JACQUELINE RICCI, JORGE SERRANO, JEFFREY SPANGENBURG, CLAUDIS WILSON, and MICHAEL WRIGHT. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:08 pm
(Kenneth Anderson) As I have occasionally noted here at VC, this term the Supreme Court will hear an Alien Tort Statute case, the Kiobel case, in which a primary question is whether the ATS embraces a theory of corporate liability. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:08 pm
It is also what a legal system does when what matters to it is its “internal” legitimacy – its fidelity to its own hierarchy of authority and interpretation. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:16 am
Bermann explored how aspects of the US legal system interface with the quest, through international convention, for uniform enforcement of international arbitration awards in commercial law matters. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 11:00 am
., 142 N.J. 520, 532-40 (1995) (similar standards apply to a motion for dismissal under Rule 4:37-2(b) and a motion for summary judgment under Rule 4:46-2(c), including whether the evidence “‘is so one-sided that one party must prevail as a matter of law’” (quoting Anderson v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:09 am
Anderson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:15 am
For those graduates who qualify for these grants, it does not matter which bar they choose to take. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:01 am
Meanwhile, Nate Anderson over at Foreign Policy tries to decipher the goals of Anonymous, the masked hackers driving governments and businesses batty. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:17 pm
Why does it matter? [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 5:05 am
The view that young children have greater capacity for cerebral reorganization of function may find support in early, focal vascular lesions, but not in severe diffused white matter injury. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:37 pm
by Kenneth Anderson (This is the second part of a guest post by Julian Arato, LLM candidate at NYU Law School; our thanks to him. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:44 am
Buzak on behalf of NJLM Evidently the courts didn’t major in urban planning either – or, for that matter, affordable housing. [read post]
