Search for: "MATTER OF C M R" Results 1921 - 1940 of 2,967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2013, 8:50 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Unless there are factors we don’t know about (I’m not even dipping my toe into those mysterious Prenda beneficiary trusts… yet), it would appear that Gibbs is, in fact, insolvent for this purpose. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 2:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
You get into an argument, and someone takes out a knife and says, “If you don’t leave right now, I’m going to kill you! [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 3:04 pm
The conflict prompted Dallas attorney Ben C. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
The law, however, proceeds upon the optimistic premise that there is a little bit of good in all of us—or perhaps upon the pessimistic assumption that no matter how bad someone is, he can always be worse. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm by Matthias Weller
– A Critical Overview of the Hague Preliminary Draft on Judgments”, Yearbook of Private International Law 17 (2015/2016), pp 1-31 Bonomi, Andrea; Mariottini, Cristina M. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 6:20 am by Barry Sookman
Bill C-32 introduced that guarantee a minimum award once infringement is proven, and which should serve to deter future infringements. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
The S&H Nadlan Case In S&H Nadlan, LLC v MLK Associates, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 30523(U) [Sup Ct NY County Mar. 7, 2016], Justice Donna M. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
The S&H Nadlan Case In S&H Nadlan, LLC v MLK Associates, LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 30523(U) [Sup Ct NY County Mar. 7, 2016], Justice Donna M. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 12:02 pm
Story 1 0 2 2 0 2 Y/M/C Story 2 0 3 2 2 4 Clusty Story 3 0 3 2 1 2 Yahoo! [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:07 am by Peter Mahler
The O’Connor Case A recent decision by Albany County Commercial Division Justice Richard M. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 10:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Under the Child Support Standards Act (D.R.L. 240[1-b][c][7] and F.C.A. 413[c][7]) the court may award educational expenses: Where the court determines, having regard for the circumstances of the case and of the respective parties and in the best interests of the child, and as justice requires, that the present or future provision of post-secondary, private, special, or enriched education for the child is appropriate. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
This is a difficult issue, and I’m not really sure of the answer, so I welcome thoughts from readers! [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 12:14 am by Jeff Nowak
For clients in other states, I’m using these cases as strong authority, but I’m not slamming the gas pedal. [read post]