Search for: "MATTER OF J C B"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 3,065
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2021, 3:42 pm
So in my judgment, for whatever that’s worth, the proper response to the second question is minimal—either to kick the matter back to Facebook for the development or rules or to say something broad and general like this: Suspensions of political leaders should be undertaken with great care and only after due deliberations and should depend on (a) the clarity of the violation, (b) the seriousness of the violation, (c) the harms caused by or potential harms… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
B. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm
Temporary Restraining Order/Preliminary Injunction[omitted] C. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 10:38 am
§1337(c). [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
J 26/87).[2.2.4] Thus the Board comes to the conclusion that the ED, when refusing the request that an appealable decision be issued has insufficiently taken account of an essential aspect and has exercised its discretion in an erroneous way. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
As it is a question of fact, ultimately this must be a matter for the court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
As it is a question of fact, ultimately this must be a matter for the court. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:16 am
See TPC §§ 71.0021(b),(c). [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 10:38 am
No indemnification shall be made under this subdivision: (1) In respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which the person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation in the performance of the person’s duty to the corporation, unless and only to the extent that the court in which the proceeding is or was pending shall determine upon application that, in view of all the circumstances of the case, the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for the… [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
William J. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
(Matter of Adam M.M. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
(Matter of Adam M.M. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
In addition, § 242(b) is designed to deal with situations where there are already multiple classes of voting stock [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 3:36 am
J. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 5:42 am
Only the second issue was argued in the Court of Appeal[2], on which Supperstone J’s decision was affirmed (with the leading judgment being given by Sir Andrew Morritt C). [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:34 am
French CJ, Gummow, Hayne and Bell J said the record companies’ argument was predicated on a wrong assumption. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:46 am
28, a defendant claiming fair comment must satisfy the following test: (a) the comment must be on a matter of public interest; (b) the comment must be based on fact; (c) the comment, though it can include inferences of fact, must be recognisable as comment; (d) the comment must satisfy the following objective test: could any person honestly express that opinion on the proved facts? [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 5:51 am
Bell, Ron C. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 3:55 am
Employee Achievement Awards Relevant provisions: IRC §§ 74(c) & 274(j); TCJA §13310 Prior to the TCJA, employers could, within limits, provide certain types of employee achievement awards on a tax-free basis. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
Proto and Jonathan C. [read post]
