Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 9,183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2014, 11:49 am
in which the General Court stated that the goods can be considered as identical when the goods designated by the earlier mark are included in a more general category designated by the trade mark application or when the goods designated by the trade mark application are included in a more general category designated by the earlier mark. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:32 pm
Last Thursday Advocate General (AG) Kokott handed down her Opinion in case C-104/18 P Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v Euipo (C-104/18 P). [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
Industria De Alimentos Zenu S.A.S. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 2:55 pm
” (quotingPerfect Web Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:45 am
Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents Designs and Trade Marks, considers Dr. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:00 pm
Judge Blackburn cited two cases in support of his authority to enter such an order: United States v. [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:28 am
What Mark Sherman Law Did to Protect Online Reputations In 2014, Mark Sherman Law took 3 national media companies to the United States Supreme Court for a client whose arrest report continued to be published online after the dismissal of her criminal charges. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:24 am
In the United States, there would be little protection against look-alike cantilever chairs if it is plain that what has been emulated is the idea -- which is not protected at all by copyright.Regarding levels of abstraction, should one compare an allegedly infringing use with a trade mark as registered, with the trade mark as used, or on any other basis? [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 8:51 am
Facts: This case (Foster v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 9:50 am
Kozak et al – United States District Court – Southern District of New York – March 7th, 2017) involves the trademarks for the words LIFEGUARD and LIFE GUARD. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 9:30 am
Facts: This case (Smith et al v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 9:54 am
Facts: This case (James Conner v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
” Mark Sherman reports at AP that “the accuracy of the once-a-decade population count is at the heart” of the case,” Department of Commerce v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:20 am
M-Tech acquired these drives from a broker in the United Statesand imported them into theUK. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
Motorola, Inc. and TCL v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:27 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 3:40 am
Franciscan Vineyards, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:08 am
Mark L. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 5:59 am
” Applicant focused on the rarity of the surname, arguing that “because there are only five people in the entire United States with the surname Belushi, substantially no one will be adversely affected by the registration of Applicant’s mark BELUSHI’S. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
Images from Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States.On June 8, 2023, the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of Jack Daniels in the case of Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
