Search for: "People v Comfort"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 2,227
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2010, 5:19 am
Consider, for example, how heavily today’s decision rested on the analysis in the Supreme Court’s 1950 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:02 pm
But Boumediene v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:40 am
V. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:43 pm
It would be one of those "persuasion" moments people seem to like to talk about. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:52 pm
We don't kill kids (Roper v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 3:23 am
However, the scope, duration and intensity of a seizure, and any subsequent search, “remain subject to the strictures of article I, §12, and judicial review” (People v Troiano, 35 NY2d 476 [1974]; People v Marsh, 20 NY2d 98 [1967]). [read post]
14 May 2010, 12:07 am
With a copyright bill only weeks away, thousands of Canadians are again speaking out for a fair, balanced approach. [read post]
13 May 2010, 6:02 pm
In Padilla v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:59 am
While there are still those who believe that the law may and ought to prohibit people from having same-sex sexual relationships, much of the current debate -- particularly after the decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 10:00 pm
She hasn't expressed a personal view either about her own views or the constitutional...JIM LEHRER: Nothing about Roe v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
So people will be left to read a limited number of tea leaves, from a person whose area of scholarly interest does not touch most of the hot button issues of current public debate. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:47 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:05 am
PETER BERKOWITZ: Harvard Law v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
In government and academia, she has shown a special capacity to bring together people with deeply held, conflicting views. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:59 am
Lord Justice Laws said: “We do not live in a society where all the people share uniform religious beliefs. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:08 pm
The first time I taught copyright, for example, I made a snarky remark about the painting at issue in Lee v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
First, in Estes v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:43 pm
Engle v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:49 pm
For one view of the old terminology, see Justice Scalia's dissent in Atkins v. [read post]
