Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 1921 - 1940 of 4,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2015, 1:23 pm by Lyle Denniston
On Tuesday, the Court set aside seventy-five minutes to explore Montgomery v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
& Others [2015] EWHC 2760 (Ch), a 6 October 2015 decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, has attracted a lot of attention on account of its subject matter: the sparkling white wines. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 5:40 am by Mark Goldstein, Esq.
On appeal, the Appellate Division overturned the lower court’s finding and stated a married person was capable of committing criminal mischief under the PDVA, even if the property that was destroyed was jointly owned by the individual. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Citing IDT Corp. v Tyco Group, 13 NY3d 209, the Appellate Division said the New York Court of Appeals has rejected "the rigid classification into Types'" in favor of asking "whether the agreement contemplated the negotiation of later agreements and if the consummation of those agreements was a precondition to a party's performance. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 11:04 am by Jon Sands
  He then asked the appellate division to certify the case for appeal to the California Court of Appeal, and when the appellate division denied certification he asked the Court of Appeal to transfer the case. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:22 am by Lauren Vodopia
The Appellate Division subsequently reversed, holding that “matrimonial litigants cannot submit custody issues to final, binding, non-appealable arbitration. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
  The same happened in the aftermath of the Puffin/Penguin case [United Biscuits v Asda, noted here]. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The OAG Policies and Procedures Manual states that, [i]t is the policy of the Office of the Attorney General that all potential criminal violations be referred to the appropriate division of the Office of Special Investigations. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The OAG Policies and Procedures Manual states that, [i]t is the policy of the Office of the Attorney General that all potential criminal violations be referred to the appropriate division of the Office of Special Investigations. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
For those interested I recommend reading Vice Chancellor Noble’s 2013 opinion in Blaustein v Lord Baltimore Capital Corp. which I wrote about here. [read post]