Search for: "State v. Ore" Results 1921 - 1940 of 2,484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
  In Euroeco Fuels (Poland) Ltd & Ors v Szczecin And Swinoujscie Seaports Authority SA & Ors [2018] EWHC 1081 (QB) Nicol J noted that Parliament had not intended to limit ‘serious financial loss’ to special damage, and that was no reason why financial loss, like other forms of serious harm, was not capable of being inferred from evidence. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: PAGO International GmbH v Tirol Milch registrierte Genossenschaft mbH (IPKat) ECJ to hear Volker Merkel & Ors v OHIM - Is PATENTCONSULT the new BABY-DRY? [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
& Ors [2020] EWHC 3589 (QB)  An order was made permitting the issue of a representative data protection action anonymously. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 8:19 am by Kay Marbiah
In a very recent decision, the court refused to accept Bitcoin as security for costs in light of the high level of volatility in value which could result in the security being effectively valueless (Tulip Trading limited v Bitcoin Association for BSV & Ors [7]). [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:58 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Even the Supreme Court in this very case (dt. 03.10.2018) stated: “This was for the reason that the judgment of this Court, in TDM Infrastructure Private Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2025, 11:32 pm by Frank Cranmer
Humanist weddings On Monday, the Chair of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, Lord Alton, wrote formally to Lord Ponsonby, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the MoJ, reminding him of the judgment of Eady J in R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin), and asking what the Government was doing about legalising humanist weddings in England and Wales – they are legal in Scotland. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
Resolved cases include: Mr Stephen Wren v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; A man v The Sun (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 11/05/2012; Ms Louise Pyne v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 08/05/2012. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Article Four further stated as follows:As an extremely loving and devoted parent, I found that the love, care and concern which I lavished on my daughter was not acknowledged or returned in any way by my daughter. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies There was a Statement in Open Court on 28 June 2017 in the case of Meechan v Reyner and Ors read before Warby J. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 8:02 am by Hayleigh Bosher
 easyGroup also recently lost out on 4 more marks due to non-use, including EASYOFFICE [easyGroup Ltd v Nuclei Ltd & Ors, a rather complex case spanning over two decades; readers can find an explainer of the latest judgment from previous Kat Rosie Burbidge here]. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
On 7 October 2019 Warby J held a PTR in the case of Birmingham City council v Afsar & ors. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design field… [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am by Melina Padron
In the courts: Staff Side of the Police Negotiating Board & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor [2011] EWHC 3175 (Admin) (02 December 2011) December 2, 2011 Change in police pension inflation index, partly done to save money, ruled lawful by High Court. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
 AbbVie also argued that since Arrow was decided nine years ago, the appellate courts have been more willing to permit EPO procedures to take their course without English judicial interference (see  Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors UK Ltd [2013] UK SC 46; [2014] A.C. 160, as summarised by Floyd LJ in IPcom GmbH & Co KG v HTC Europe Co Ltd & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 1496; [2014] R.P.C. 12.)Carr J rejected these… [read post]