Search for: "State v. True"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 21,790
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2021, 12:13 pm
" True that, I guess.)The Court of Appeal not only affirms, but also drops a footnote: "We assume the trial court and attorney Weisberg have already reported the judicially imposed sanctions to the State Bar of California. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 9:33 am
Essentially impossible; all the government has to do is to have its lawyers come up with a non-laughable post hoc argument for the way two different groups are treated that might potentially in some universe be true and, boom, the state wins.So it's noteworthy that the Court of Appeal here -- in the midst of a lengthy opinion on numerous distinct issues -- holds that the statute at issue violates equal protection.Not that the Court of Appeal is wrong; indeed, it's… [read post]
15 May 2025, 11:54 am
True enough, I suspect. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:44 am
To survive the motion, the amended complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
S170577: I attended the oral argument today at the California Supreme Court for Sullivan v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:25 pm
In Grant v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:25 pm
In Grant v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:36 pm
If true, Robert directly disregarded the court's May 1988 order and violated the public policy of this state. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 12:00 pm
" Slip op. at 5, citing Hurley v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:14 am
Quesada v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
The same is true here. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
–State v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 10:30 am
” United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 6:27 am
A SDNY case -- Nembhard v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 2:12 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Doe v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 8:27 am
Case citation: Martinez v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:55 am
‘A different rule,’ as was said in Camfield v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm
In R. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 8:27 am
State UDAPs. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am
” If true, that representation would be a massive concession by the plaintiffs–but they didn’t make it. [read post]
