Search for: "United States v. Michigan"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 3,728
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2020, 8:54 am
United States,” said Colon. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:00 pm
United States 15-537Issue: (1) Whether, under Ashe v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 7:05 pm
Cal., filed December 14, 2011).Neal Fortin is the author of Food Regulation: Law, Science, Policy, and Practice, and he is Professor and Director of the Michigan State University Institute for Food Laws and Regulations, where he teaches online courses in Food Regulation in the United States, International Food Law, and Codex Alimentarius. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:36 am
• Policy considerations and implications in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 1:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 3:17 pm
The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld that principle under the United States Constitution…. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Whether a particular property has “wetlands” as defined by the Federal Wetland Delineation Manual and whether the wetlands constitute “waters of the United States” is not a matter easily discernable by anybody. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 12:55 pm
The Court did decide one case this week, United Student Aid Funds v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 3:26 am
United States, 346 F.3d 386, 399 (3d Cir.2003) ("[T]he Court in Illinois Council seemed to read Michigan Academy as creating an exception to the channeling requirement of § 405(h) in those cases where no judicial review is available at all. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:21 am
The City moved for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(8) of Smith’s WPA claim arguing that the assignment didn’t constitute an adverse employment action under the WPA.AnalysisThe WPA prohibits an employer from discharging or discriminating against an employee because the employee reports a violation or suspected violation of a rule, regulation or law of Michigan or the United States. [read post]
4 May 2011, 12:04 pm
Then, this year, United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 12:14 pm
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); Cablevision of Michigan, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 12:14 pm
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); Cablevision of Michigan, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 9:55 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganOpinion Date: 3/20/09Cite: Victory Lane Quick Oil Change, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 4:43 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 5:44 am
The case came up through habeas, and under the standards applicable to that review, the Michigan courts’ decision couldn’t be reversed unless it was “was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
Solicitor General, argued on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of Michigan. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm
Michigan Pamela Brandwein (Michigan Political Science) -presents “United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:03 am
Thomas, United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:55 am
Virginia decision arose from a criminal action appealed from a state supreme court, and the 2013 United States v. [read post]
