Search for: "Ye Li" Results 1921 - 1940 of 3,147
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2012, 10:23 am by Bart Torvik
Yes, even in disciplinary cases decided in per curiam opinions. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:58 pm by Caleb Mason
  This is what Daisey has repeatedly said: that he was “making art,” not “asserting facts,” that he’s a “storyteller within the context of the theater,” not a journalist, that he lied to Ira Glass because “the work was really good,” and his “larger truth” about manufacturing conditions was more important. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:34 pm by Jack Goldsmith
  “[I]n a kind of mission creep,” Ben said, “the human rights groups refused to take ‘yes’ for an answer. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:12 am by Mandelman
  Well, the truth is… there’s simply too much involved to make a ‘YES’ or ‘NO’ answer on principal reductions meaningful. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:21 am by Thom Cooper
  As I detailed in another blog, and yes I will stop shamelessly plugging my blogs after this, http://cooperelderlaw.com/asset-protection/public-pension-problems-persist/ the problem lies with how these pensions are funded. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:22 am by Alan Rozenshtein
He emphasized that foreign relations decisionmaking is “highly political,” “delicate,” “complex,” and “typically lies well beyond the experience or professional capacity of a judge. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 1:29 pm by Rich Vetstein
I cannot believe I'm writing this post, but yes it's true, the real estate market in Greater Boston, Massachusetts has now come full circle and bidding wars are back. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 4:48 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” It does not focus on the possibility that a law of nature (or its equivalent) that meets these conditions will nonetheless create the kind of risk that under­ lies the law of nature exception, namely the risk that a patent on the law would significantly impede future innovation. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:00 am by Rick
So the United States Supreme Court says, Yes, there was IAC here. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:52 pm by Gideon
The problem with these opinions lies – as it often does – with the remedy. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
United States, No. 11-199 (Docket; SCOTUSblog; LII) Background: Petitioner was convicted in District Court of conspiracy to possess more than 500 grams of cocaine with intent to distribute, and sentenced to 20 years incarceration (yes, really: 20 years). [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 5:28 pm by Stephen Gillers
 Defendant then answered "yes" when asked if she had lied at the plea hearing (the jury did not know it was a plea hearing). [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:25 am by Gideon
It is true that, when asked if they support the death penalty, 67% of respondents said yes. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:20 am by Stan
Yes, the government here contributed to her training, and good on them for providing that opportunity. [read post]