Search for: "*grand Jury, in Re"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 2,791
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2008, 1:38 pm
Several months later, a grand jury indicted Rothgery and he was re-arrested and given a higher bail. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 4:49 am
In January 2003, a grand jury indicted Rothgery for unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon, resulting in his re-arrest and an increase in his bail to $15,000, which he could not pay. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 12:30 pm
Allegation: Man hits his wife, flees from Grand Prairie, Tex. police. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Orsburn, No. 07-2584, 07-2585 Convictions for mail fraud are affirmed, but the sentences vacated and the case remanded for re-sentencing where the trial court applied the wrong Guidelines sentence when it concluded that embezzling money from the government fell under section 2C1.1 of the Guidelines which covers frauds that incl [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
An employee of the insurer testified before the Grand Jury and at Witasick’s trial. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 1:15 pm
Circuit, where the case—In Re Grand Jury Investigation—was argued before a courtroom with a couple dozen reporters and the spectator seating section half full. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Lilly, No. 06-2613 Denial of an inmate's habeas petition based upon ineffective assistance of counsel is affirmed where there was sufficient evidence for a jury to have convicted defendant, and therefore no prejudice to defendant resulted from heeding his attorney's advice to waive a jury trial. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 4:44 am
Sure, you could have been reviewing Jencks Act materials, or grand jury testimony, or the caselaw that would have answered the judges questions, but you couldn’t. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In this “narrow range of cases,” the sentencing court could examine court documents – the charging instrument and the jury instructions – to determine if the state conviction was for the branch of the relevant crime that matched the generic federal definition of the predicate offense for a “violent felony” under the ACCA. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 5:58 am
And one of the reasons is that if indictments are not sought, then the Justice Department is, under its judicial policies, not to be holding press conferences, setting forth reasons, information, why it’s not taking action in terms of going to the grand jury and seeking an indictment. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 2:28 am
That puts Roe in a really bad place: If the jury believes what John says – that Jane heard Roe confess to the murder for which he is on trial – they’re almost certainly going to convict him (unless he’s arguing self-defense, say). [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 7:32 am
There was a time when Munich plaintiffs viewed the 7th Civil Chamber the "grand prize" in the lottery that is the assignment of new cases to a division. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 12:12 pm
The United States Department of Justice has recently appointed a grand jury to investigate criminal accusations that have arisen out of the dismissal of the nine U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
The majority in In re Grand Jury Matter, Gronowicz, 764 F.2d 983 (3d Cir. 1985) (en banc), held that it was indeed constitutional to prosecute an author for allegedly defrauding a publisher and a movie producer based on the author’s alleged misrepresentations about his contacts with Pope John Paul II, misrepresentations that appeared in the book itself. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
The majority in In re Grand Jury Matter, Gronowicz, 764 F.2d 983 (3d Cir. 1985) (en banc), held that it was indeed constitutional to prosecute an author for allegedly defrauding a publisher and a movie producer based on the author’s alleged misrepresentations about his contacts with Pope John Paul II, misrepresentations that appeared in the book itself. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 6:18 am
Kane has been accused of illegally giving grand jury documents to a newspaper in order to embarrass a critic, and then trying to cover up her actions with false testimony to a different grand jury. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:33 am
In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970) (the prosecution must prove every element of a crime “beyond a reasonable doubt” for the defendant to be convicted.) [read post]
11 May 2008, 5:00 am
(If you're interested in reading the Davenport opinion, you can find it on the Ninth Circuit's website. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 8:54 am
Temkin, principals in Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason, Anello & Bohrer, write that there is no question that in certain situations, such as receipt of a grand jury subpoena, IRS summons or court order, an accountant is compelled to disclose client information. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 2:48 am
From the time of his arrest on April 11, 2005 until his June 29, 2005 guilty plea, defendant consistently maintained his innocence and so testified at the grand jury. [read post]
