Search for: "CF-3"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 2,385
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
Nevertheless, he was again detained in jail (cf. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:11 pm
(3) If question 2 is answered in the negative, what are the relevant criteria for distinguishing non-microbiological plant production processes excluded from patent protection under A 53(b) from non-excluded ones? [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:06 pm
We do not accept that that conclusion was open to his Honour in circumstances where there is no suggestion that any income actually received by the husband was used for the purposes other than the parties’ family and/or business (cf Parshen v Parshen (1996) FLC 92-720). [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
Article 11(3) RPBA). [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:05 am
It’s sort of (but not quite) like the New York Times publishing the Pentagon Papers, which the United States Supreme Court ruled 6-3 it could do because there was no imminent grave harm that would justify a prior restraint such as an order to stop the presses. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 5:17 am
Il résulte désormais des normes concernant la lutte contre le blanchiment d'argent que les intermédiaires financiers doivent, dans les limites fixées par la loi (cf. art. 3 à 10 LBA), collaborer avec les autorités compétentes. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:06 pm
., 3 Misc 3d 43, 44; cf. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
, 51 AD3d 775; cf. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 8:25 am
The communication should be standardised. 3. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
(Cf. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:19 am
The BRT and the Chamber also filed a motion [3] with the SEC on September 29 seeking a stay of the new rules. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:31 am
A segunda instância determinou que a empresa Google Brasil pagar 3 mil vezes o valor de cada vídeo multiplicado por cada curso disponibilizado. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:18 am
I expected no less in light of the 5-3 and 5-4 split decisions in Stolt-Nielsen and Rent-A-Center West v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 5:37 pm
If not, Alberta will not be granted intervenor status. 3) In its Notice, the Board expressed the preliminary opinion that the participation of certain persons would not be of assistance in these proceedings. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 2:06 pm
For now, we learned from @EUCouncilPress that the enhanced co-operation has made its way on the agenda of the EU Competitiveness Council on 10 December 2010 (cf. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 9:37 am
Stolt-Neilsen (Alito, 2010); cf. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
J 2/86 and J 3/86 ; J 23/92 ; T 491/89 [6]). [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:12 pm
Cf. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 2:24 pm
The Codd Bottle On February 4, 2010, the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH) ruled in a second-instance nullity action that it is sufficient for "technicality" (or a technical character) of a claim if the respective teaching is "embedded in a technical apparatus" (cf. [read post]
