Search for: "D. T. S. v. B. E. C."
Results 1941 - 1960
of 3,325
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
But just as Justice Scalia’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Stichting de Thuiskopie v Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH(The 1709 Copyright Blog) ECJ: upholds ‘compulsory licences’ of Green Dot trade mark: Der Grüne Punkt-Duales System Deutschland GmbH v European Commission (JIPLP) ECJ: Manifest inadmissibility of reference for preliminary ruling in Canon Kabushiki Kaisha (C-181/09) (Class 46) (IPKat) Bud court asks ECJ: what is ‘acquiesced’? [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
C. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:32 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from a case called Richey v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 10:50 am
And, given the way the law has already evolved in this area, and given the excesses of the #me too movement, one doesn’t have to be paranoid or have a wild imagination to see how this law could be used for nefarious purposes. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
A subsequent reconciliation would not appear to invoke relief under subsections (b), (c) and (d). [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
Resources Code, § 21080.09(b), (d).) [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:02 pm
Dep't of Land and Natural Resources, State of Hawaii and the ICA's opinion can be found here. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:21 am
See, e.g., Oxendine v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
The kidnapping indictment stated that “[D]efendant also sexually assaulted [Maya]” while the jury was instructed “that the person was not released by the defendant in a safe place. [read post]
3 May 2009, 2:31 pm
Hank Johnson (D-Ga). [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:50 pm
G.S. 15A-131(d). [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:34 am
Dep’t. of Revenue, 384 Ill. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
State, 824 S.W.2d 568 (1992): [E]vidence derived from a scientific theory, to be considered reliable, must satisfy three criteria in any particular case: (a) the underlying scientific theory must be valid; (b) the technique applying the theory must be valid; and (c) the technique must have been properly applied on the occasion in question. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 11:13 am
c) Los montos y/o porcentajes que cobren las AFP por los conceptos establecidos en los literales a) o d) del artículo 24 de la presente Ley, aplicables sobre la remuneración asegurable. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 11:42 am
B. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
White v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 3:13 pm
Eq. 179 (E. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 4:19 pm
(b) To make up AL's shortfall, raise an additional $16 there through, say, a federal tax on AL's real property base, using AL valuations, and perhaps exempting, say, the bottom 5 (or whatever) of AL's taxpayers, based on their personal income or wealth,(c) What's unfair here, they argue, is not AL's taxpayers paying higher rates on something as such - given federalism, taxpayers in different states pay different… [read post]
